I believe the answer to this is D- Plebeians
In Russia, the system of government during the 17th century was absolute monarchy. What this means is that, under this system, a king (or <em>tzar</em>) has complete power to act in any way he sees fit. This means that he is above the law, and that the rest of the government needs to respond to his wishes only.
On the other hand, the system that operated in England was that of a constitutional monarchy. Under this system, no one is above the law. This means that the monarch does not have absolute power because he still has to respect what the law states. Moreover, the government similarly needs to adhere to these laws, and therefore, the king cannot enforce his will, but he has to negotiate and collaborate with the rest of the government.
Answer:
it didn't change
Explanation:
war is war just because the U.S. got involved doesn't mean it changed
It was created to take charge of education activities. Whether it were to freedmen or refugees. These issues were under things such as clothes and medication. This was also good for african americans because they had rights they were denied when slaves. Such as social service , violence and justice, labor and contracts, and family services.
Answer:
The best completes the list above is Sherman Anti-Trust Act.
Explanation:
The Sherman Antitrust Act was passed in 1890 to shorten the successions of power that intervene with commerce and lessen the economic struggle. It condemns both legal cartels and struggles to acquire any part of the trade-in the United States.
The Act's objective was to encourage economic rationality and competitiveness and to manage interstate commerce.
