This is true. When you choose between two things, the thing that you didn't choose is what cost you the thing you chose. It's called an opportunity cost and it presents what you had to lose or give up in order to attain the thing that you chose and assessing these costs is extremely important in decision making.
"In order to address the question we would have to assess it carefully. Terrorismappears to be problematic to define. So far no internationally accepted legal<span>de<span>fi<span>ni<span>ti<span><span>on of te</span><span>rr<span>or<span>is<span><span>m ex</span><span>is<span>ts<span><span>, de</span><span>sp<span>it<span><span>e th</span><span><span>e va</span><span>ri<span>ou<span><span>s at</span><span>te<span>mp<span>ts<span><span>. Th</span><span><span>e po</span><span>lit<span>ical</span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span><span>connotatio<span>ns of the term make such a task</span></span>quasiimpossible from a legal point of view. Constituting one of the pathologies of the political system, terrorism andpolitical violence are to be studied first as social phenomena and then as illegalactivities that put at risk the well-being of innocent citizens. States undoubtedlyhave both the obligation and the necessity to protect their own citizens, giventhat terrorist attacks pose a threat to both the internal and the international<span>legal and political order. The terrorist attacks of 9/11 will remain in the collective</span>memory as the day when international terrorism managed to strike the heart of <span>th<span>e so<span>le su<span>pe<span>rp<span>ow<span>er su<span>bs<span>eq<span>ue<span>nt<span>ly be<span>co<span>mi<span>ng th<span>e ou<span>tm<span>os<span>t th<span>re<span>at to the</span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span>contemporary world order. The response to this attack was criticized heavilyex post by various scholars as well as executive security personnel of the U.S. Thepresent essay in accordance with the critics of the military intervention argues <span>that such a strategy has not been effective." Credits: Nikolaos Nikolakakis.
</span>
Answer:
Can you at least tell me what treaty we are talking about right now?
Explanation:
Confused.