Answer:
January 1, 2016:
Dr Accumulated Depreciation account 12,000
Cr Cash account 12,000
Explanation:
The accumulated depreciation account is a contra asset account used to record all the incurred depreciation expense since the asset (or assets) was being used or put into service.
Since the repairs extended the life cycle of the asset, then its accumulated depreciation decreases.
Answer:
D. Product/service management
Explanation:
"Creating, developing, retaining, and obtaining...meets consumer needs" basically equals management
"Products and services"=product/service
Add them together is product/service management!
Let me know if you have any more questions :)
C. less painful parting with cash
Answer:
I prepared an amortization schedule using an excel spreadsheet. The original monthly payment was $836.44. After the 120th payment, the remaining principal balance was $68,940.64. Since she didn't pay anything for 1 year, the new principal balance will be $68,940.64 x (1 + 8%) = $74,455.89
I prepared another amortization schedule for the remaining 9 years, and the monthly payment is $969.32. She will pay off the loan in 108 months.
<span class="sg-text sg-text--link sg-text--bold sg-text--link-disabled sg-text--blue-dark">
pdf
</span>
<span class="sg-text sg-text--link sg-text--bold sg-text--link-disabled sg-text--blue-dark">
pdf
</span>
Answer:
c. liable on the ground that Mesa is an intended third-party beneficiary
Explanation:
In a contract, the third-party beneficiary is a business or a person that benefits from the agreement and the terms of the contract that is made between the two other parties. According to law, third-party beneficiary have certain rights which they can enforced if the contract is not fulfilled.
In the context, Mesa is a third party beneficiary. The Mesa County enters into a contract with New Construct Inc. to construct a court house. Now New Construct Inc. again hires the firm Odell to excavate the land site.
While excavating Odell damages few nearby properties, so Mesa County files a law suit against Odell. But Odell argues that Odell is not in agreement with Mesa County or have not entered into with any contract with the County, so Mesa cannot sue the excavator.
But the court hold that as Mesa County is the third party beneficiary of the contract and have certain rights, Odell is held liable for the loss and should compensate for the loss to the County.
