D because 144 /45% is 320 EZ hope i helped you drop a brianlest for me to pls
Answer: A) 0.1
Explanation:
<span>Each of the integers in the first set could be combined with any from the second set, giving a total of 4 x 5 = 20 possible pairs.Of these the combinations that could give a sum of 23 are (5 + 18), and (9 + 14)<span>This means that the probability of getting a sum of 23 is 2/20 = 1/10</span></span>
This year is yer number 2 , so t = 2
which means that the next year will be t = 3
So, Epsilon-delta should order :
42000 (1.3 ^ (3/2))
= 62,254 Tags
Hope this helps
An imaginary number " i " is the squared root of -1, so whenever you square i it's like squaring a squared root. The squared root would cancel and you would be left with just the number under it, that is, the -1.
i ^ 2 = -1
Answer:
Null hypothesis: ∪ = No possible child abuse or neglect
Alternative hypothesis: Uₐ = Possible child abuse or neglect
Step-by-step explanation:
Null hypothesis: ∪ = No possible child abuse or neglect
Alternative hypothesis: Uₐ = Possible child abuse or neglect
A type I error occurs when you reject the null hypothesis when it is true. In this situation, a type I error occurs when you conclude on possible child neglect or abuse and place the child in protective custody
A type II error occurs when you accept the null hypothesis when it is false. In this instance, a type II error occurs when you conclude on no possible child abuse or neglect when there is and fail to remove the child from the home.
In this case, the type II error is the more serious error. Failure to remove the child when there is possible child abuse or neglect will lead to more detrimental effect. Although, the type I error is also serious, it is not so detrimental as the type II error.
