1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
AfilCa [17]
3 years ago
10

If EF equals 2X -12, FG equals 3X -15 and e.g. equals 23 find EF

Mathematics
1 answer:
ElenaW [278]3 years ago
5 0
I would need to see a picture of the shape to get a idea on how to solve this
You might be interested in
What is the domain of y=log6x
elena-14-01-66 [18.8K]

Answer:

i think its c

Step-by-step explanation:


4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
For the rational function f(x)= 5x3-x/2x3 , identify any removable discontinuities.
Ierofanga [76]

Answer:

Earlier this month, news broke of progress on this 82-year-old question, thanks to prolific mathematician Terence Tao. And while the story of Tao’s breakthrough is good news, the problem isn’t fully solved.

A refresher on the Collatz Conjecture: It’s all about that function f(n), shown above, which takes even numbers and cuts them in half, while odd numbers get tripled and then added to 1. Take any natural number, apply f, then apply f again and again. You eventually land on 1, for every number we’ve ever checked. The Conjecture is that this is true for all natural numbers.

Tao’s recent work is a near-solution to the Collatz Conjecture in some subtle ways. But his methods most likely can’t be adapted to yield a complete solution to the problem, as he subsequently explained. So we might be working on it for decades longer.

The Conjecture is in the math discipline known as Dynamical Systems, or the study of situations that change over time in semi-predictable ways. It looks like a simple, innocuous question, but that’s what makes it special. Why is such a basic question so hard to answer? It serves as a benchmark for our understanding; once we solve it, then we can proceed to much more complicated matters.

The study of dynamical systems could become more robust than anyone today could imagine. But we’ll need to solve the Collatz Conjecture for the subject to flourish.

Step-by-step explanation:

Earlier this month, news broke of progress on this 82-year-old question, thanks to prolific mathematician Terence Tao. And while the story of Tao’s breakthrough is good news, the problem isn’t fully solved.

A refresher on the Collatz Conjecture: It’s all about that function f(n), shown above, which takes even numbers and cuts them in half, while odd numbers get tripled and then added to 1. Take any natural number, apply f, then apply f again and again. You eventually land on 1, for every number we’ve ever checked. The Conjecture is that this is true for all natural numbers.

Tao’s recent work is a near-solution to the Collatz Conjecture in some subtle ways. But his methods most likely can’t be adapted to yield a complete solution to the problem, as he subsequently explained. So we might be working on it for decades longer.

The Conjecture is in the math discipline known as Dynamical Systems, or the study of situations that change over time in semi-predictable ways. It looks like a simple, innocuous question, but that’s what makes it special. Why is such a basic question so hard to answer? It serves as a benchmark for our understanding; once we solve it, then we can proceed to much more complicated matters.

The study of dynamical systems could become more robust than anyone today could imagine. But we’ll need to solve the Collatz Conjecture for the subject to flourish.Earlier this month, news broke of progress on this 82-year-old question, thanks to prolific mathematician Terence Tao. And while the story of Tao’s breakthrough is good news, the problem isn’t fully solved.

A refresher on the Collatz Conjecture: It’s all about that function f(n), shown above, which takes even numbers and cuts them in half, while odd numbers get tripled and then added to 1. Take any natural number, apply f, then apply f again and again. You eventually land on 1, for every number we’ve ever checked. The Conjecture is that this is true for all natural numbers.

Tao’s recent work is a near-solution to the Collatz Conjecture in some subtle ways. But his methods most likely can’t be adapted to yield a complete solution to the problem, as he subsequently explained. So we might be working on it for decades longer.

The Conjecture is in the math discipline known as Dynamical Systems, or the study of situations that change over time in semi-predictable ways. It looks like a simple, innocuous question, but that’s what makes it special. Why is such a basic question so hard to answer? It serves as a benchmark for our understanding; once we solve it, then we can proceed to much more complicated matters.

The study of dynamical systems could become more robust than anyone today could imagine. But we’ll need to solve the Collatz Conjecture for the subject to flourish.Earlier this month, news broke of progress on this 82-year-old question, thanks to prolific mathematician Terence Tao. And while the story of Tao’s breakthrough is good news, the problem isn’t fully solved.

A refresher on the Collatz Conjecture: It’s all about that function f(n), shown above, which takes even numbers and cuts them in half, while odd numbers get tripled and then added to 1. Take any natural number, apply f, then apply f again and again. You eventually land on 1, for every number we’ve ever checked. The Conjecture is that this is true for all natural numbers.

Tao’s rece

3 0
3 years ago
Point V lies between points U and W on Line segment U W.
Nutka1998 [239]

Answer:

The correct answer is (d) 36 units.

Step-by-step explanation:

Just took the test on edge :)

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Help me out! (URGENT) I need help with numbers 1-6 please
Alex Ar [27]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

1. Blank= 5

2. Blank= 10 (I believe)

3. Blank= 8

4. Blank= 13 (I believe)

5. Blank= 12

6. Blank= 7

Hope it helps!

OwO

4 0
3 years ago
six angles of a heptagon measure 107, 139, 131, 110, 145. and 128. what is the measure of the seventh angle​
alexgriva [62]

the measure is 140, I basically summed all of the angles of a polygon of “n”, which is 7, then I did 7-2 times 180 (900) so I can finally add up all of your measurements

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • I need help please answers any questions
    9·1 answer
  • Ram is 9 years older than Hari. Three years ago, he was two times as old as Hari was. Find their present age.
    5·1 answer
  • HELP ASAP
    9·1 answer
  • If you can only use 3 of these numbers once to find a sum of 30 without subtracting or adding additional numbers, what three num
    6·2 answers
  • Write an equation of the line, in point slope form, that passes through the two given points.
    9·1 answer
  • -6 + (-2) + 5= ? <br><br> Help would really be appreciated!! :)
    12·2 answers
  • Tomas got 3/4 of the questions correct on an exam. There were 24 questions on the exam. What number of questions did Tomas get c
    14·1 answer
  • Answer plz. Give an explanation so I know ur not just getting points so I dont report. Thank you!
    12·1 answer
  • What’s the domain and range of f(x) = 72 - 1/6x?
    12·1 answer
  • Valeria wants to ride her bicycle 48 miles this week. She has already ridden 18 miles. If she rides for 4 more days, what is the
    11·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!