Either number 1 or number 3.
Bahahaha I don't even know.
sorry
Griffith's experiment worked with two types of pneumococcal bacteria (a rough type and a smooth type) and identified that a "transforming principle" could transform them from one type to another.
At first, bacteriologists suspected the transforming factor was a protein. The "transforming principle" could be precipitated with alcohol, which showed that it was not a carbohydrate. But Avery and McCarty observed that proteases (enzymes that degrade proteins) did not destroy the transforming principle. Neither did lipases (enzymes that digest lipids). Later they found that the transforming substance was made of nucleic acids but ribonuclease (which digests RNA) did not inactivate the substance. By this method, they were able to obtain small amounts of highly purified transforming principle, which they could then analyze through other tests to determine its identity, which corresponded to DNA.
Hi I am a farmer and if you planet something in a spot year after year and don`t move it around you will drain the nutrients from the soil and it will not be good for farming any more so I will go with answer B. I hope that is right.
3) C. Stomata, as I explained in my previous answer.
4) B. Nonvascular, low-hanging plants living in moist environs don't have to fight gravity nearly as much as tall ones do. So they needn't highly developed vessels to transport to their tips
5) B. Gravity, see above. The higher trees/plants grew, the further their apical structures were from ground water sources, so the lignin-supported, strong vascular tissue (phloem) allows the transport of water against gravity, using a capillary method (benefiting from the adhesive effect of water molecules).
The diffusion would be affected because it would take longer for the solute concentration on both sides to be equal
