Answer:
Explanation:
Historians since the late 20th century have debated how women shared in the French Revolution and what long-term impact it had on French women. Women had no political rights in pre-Revolutionary France; they were considered "passive" citizens, forced to rely on men to determine what was best for them. That changed dramatically in theory as there seemingly were great advances in feminism. Feminism emerged in Paris as part of a broad demand for social and political reform. The women demanded equality to men and then moved on to a demand for the end of male domination. Their chief vehicle for agitation were pamphlets and women's clubs, especially the Society of Revolutionary Republican Women. However, the Jacobin (radical) element in power abolished all the women's clubs in October 1793 and arrested their leaders. The movement was crushed. Devance explains the decision in terms of the emphasis on masculinity in wartime, Marie Antoinette's bad reputation for feminine interference in state affairs, and traditional male supremacy.[1] A decade later the Napoleonic Code confirmed and perpetuated women's second-class status.[2]
Answer:
The relationship between the states and the federal ...www.khanacademy.org › us-gov-foundations › relation...
There is an ongoing negotiation over the balance of power between the two levels. ... it seems natural to US citizens that government is divided into multiple layers, ... between multiple levels of government with jurisdiction over the same territory ... Powers reserved to the federal government or state governments, not shared ...
Explanation:
The relationship between the states and the federal ...www.khanacademy.org › us-gov-foundations › relation...
There is an ongoing negotiation over the balance of power between the two levels. ... it seems natural to US citizens that government is divided into multiple layers, ... between multiple levels of government with jurisdiction over the same territory ... Powers reserved to the federal government or state governments, not shared ...
There was an anti-war movement in the US, pro communism in the US was never a thing back then so I’m assuming the other one is true too lol.
Answer:
Malthus was very concerned about unchecked population growth.
Explanation:
As a matter of opinion, I think it would be safe to say that Thomas Malthus would be in favor of the one-child policy because it would be a limit to the exponential growth in population we have undergone since his time. He was worried about our rapid growth in population and not being able to sistaine resources. He famously proposed 2 ways to keep our population in check, by means of "moral restraint" which China's policy would fall under or by means of natural plagues, famine various disease and even warfare.
The current gender gap is based:
on the difference in voting choices by men and by women.
As can often be seen, men and women usually have different voting preferences.
Explanation:
Basically, after we check with numerical quantity, this is often the proportion of the quantity of voters World Health Organization are eligible to pick out associate election. Since it mentions gender gap, then this refers to vote men and ladies, specifically their choice selections.
The gender pay gap is that the average distinction between the remuneration for men and ladies.