Marco makes 36,000 a year. if he receives a 5% raise, how much more money will he be getting each year?
2 answers:
Answer:
f(n)= 36,000(0.05) + 36,000 (0.05)² + 36,000 (0.05)³ +...+ 36,000 (0.05)ⁿ =
f(n)= 36,000(0.05) ( 1 +0.05 + 0.05² + ...+ 0.05ⁿ⁻¹)
Step-by-step explanation:
The problem tells us that Marco makes 36,000 dollars a year, if he receives a 5% raise, we will need to multiply the current amount by 0.05 to know how much more is he getting:
However the problem doesn't end up there because <u>on the second year he will get a 5% of the amount he will be making after the first 5% raise</u>. So after the first year <u>he will be getting (36,000 + 1800 = 37800) and he will get a 5% raise</u>, so he will get a raise of
37800 (0.05)
We can write this as a function in terms of the numbers of years that have passed,
for year 1 we have that the raise will be:
f(1) = 36,000(0.05)
for the second year we will have
f(2) = 36,000 (0.05) + 36,000 (0.05)²
so for the nth year, the amount of raise will be
f(n)= 36,000(0.05) + 36,000 (0.05)² + 36,000 (0.05)³ +...+ 36,000 (0.05)ⁿ
= 36,000(0.05) ( 1 +0.05 + 0.05² + ...+ 0.05ⁿ⁻¹)
You might be interested in
Note that powers of 2 can be written in binary as
and so on. Observe that
digits are required to represent the 
-th power of 2 in binary.
Also observe that
so we need only add 1 to the logarithm to find the number of binary digits needed to represent powers of 2. For any other number (non-power-of-2), we would need to round down the logarithm to the nearest integer, since for example,
That is, both 2 and 3 require only two binary digits, so we don't care about the decimal part of
. We only need the integer part, 
, then we add 1.
Now,
, and 999 falls between these consecutive powers of 2. That means
which means 999 requires
binary digits.
Your question seems to ask how many binary digits in total you need to represent all of the numbers 0-999. That would depend on how you encode numbers that requires less than 10 digits, like 1. Do you simply write
? Or do you pad this number with 0s to get 10 digits, i.e. 
? In the latter case, the answer is obvious; 
total binary digits are needed.
In the latter case, there's a bit more work involved, but really it's just a matter of finding how many number lie between successive powers of 2. For instance, 0 and 1 both require one digit, 2 and 3 require two, while 4-7 require three, while 8-15 require four, and so on.
and so on. Observe that
Also observe that
so we need only add 1 to the logarithm to find the number of binary digits needed to represent powers of 2. For any other number (non-power-of-2), we would need to round down the logarithm to the nearest integer, since for example,
That is, both 2 and 3 require only two binary digits, so we don't care about the decimal part of
Now,
which means 999 requires
Your question seems to ask how many binary digits in total you need to represent all of the numbers 0-999. That would depend on how you encode numbers that requires less than 10 digits, like 1. Do you simply write
In the latter case, there's a bit more work involved, but really it's just a matter of finding how many number lie between successive powers of 2. For instance, 0 and 1 both require one digit, 2 and 3 require two, while 4-7 require three, while 8-15 require four, and so on.