I believe the answer is: <span> early learning experiences and reinforcement history.
According to skinner, the level of aggressiveness that people show is a direct result of the accumulation of their past experience when they tried to get something what they want.
People tend to show higher level of aggressiveness if the people around them constantly cater to their needs and fulfill their wishes without giving them any challenge.</span>
Answer:
b. To bring attention to the unpopular platform of the program
Explanation:
The student protesters sat outside the Democratic National Convention in order to bring attention to the unpopular platform of the program.
Protest can be defined as an action taken to show disagreement, disapproval or objection about a particular situation.
It is a way of expressing one's view or perspective about a situation.
The student protesters hasn't sat outside the Democratic National Convention to voice their ideas for a candidate or allow the media to see what a non-violent protest looked like or try and recruit people in their organization but to bring attention to the unpopular platform of the program
Answer:
a. the spacing effect
Explanation:
The spacing effect: In psychology, the term spacing effect was first introduced by a German psychologist named Hermann Ebbinghaus, and is defined as the phenomenon which suggests that the long-term memory of an individual is increased when the learning related to different events are being spaced apart in interval of time instead of occurrence in immediate succession.
Example: Remembering items in a list.
In the question above, the given statement illustrates the spacing effect.
Answer of question 6:
The mark seen on the picture is called: crescendo.
Explanation:
It is an Italian term mark that means gradually getting louder.
As we can notice a crescendo (abbreviated as <em>cresc.</em>) is a horizontal mark with an opening angle (like so: <). It can be followed by another dynamics command.
In order to answer the question 7, the piece is needed.
Answer:
There are many pros and cons to this concept.
The pros are that we have better materials for protection and offense for our military. Also, this gives individuals better defense, as well.
The cons to this concept is that people in the wrong state of mind can easily injure or worse kill vulnerable people.
So what does this say about the United States in general?
The United States is like a pan balance; if there aren’t many weapons, there will be fewer massacres, shootings and robberies. But, say someone in a situation where that does happen, there is a higher and unfortunate chance that they won’t be able to protect themselves. If there are lots of weapons, there will be more crime, but also an increase in defense & protection and a decrease in vulnerability.
The United States is full of extremely intelligent people which can have dangerous consequences. An increase in weapons technology is another step up in nature and it shows America’s power, brilliance, and intelligence. This will make the U.S. military undefeatable.
