1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
GuDViN [60]
3 years ago
9

Click here to read and refer to "Mary Pickersgill, Flagmaker" by Johnathan T. Barnes in order to answer the question below. Remo

ving any mention of the British in this article would be which kind of bias? bias by omission bias by source choice unintentional bias bias by arrangement none of these
History
2 answers:
Furkat [3]3 years ago
6 0

Answer: Bias by omission.

  • <em>Bias by omission</em> refers to the exclusion of relevant information. In this case, removing mention of the British would be a bias of omission.
  • <em>Bias by source choice</em> happens when an author only looks at a certain type of source, especially when this type is likely to confirm the opinion of the author.
  • <em>Unintentional bias</em> occurs when the author's personal beliefs or ideology are unconsciously introduced in the text.
  • <em>Bias by arrangement</em> happens when a story is purposely designed to be more accessible to readers, therefore minimizing the impact of other stories. This happens when the media covers only one type of stories.
joja [24]3 years ago
3 0
Removing any mention of the British in this article would be BIAS BY OMISSION.

Bias by Omission is the failure to include something that should have an impact on the readers. This is a way of swaying the readers to a certain point of view or opinion without giving them the whole truth.


You might be interested in
PLEASE HELP!
ollegr [7]

Answer:

Some call the War of 1812, the United State's second war of independence because it generated a lot of pride and helped to consolidate political views after the war, to the point that the period after the war ended in 1815 is referred to as the "Era of Good Feelings." But there were also divisions between the Federalists who supported Britain and the other emerging political forces who wanted expansionism, especially West and who supported the ideas of the French Revolution.

Explanation:

Examples of Division:

The Northeastern United States relied heavily on trade with Britain, so they were therefore opposed with beginning the war. These were the Federalists who accused war supporters of wanting to use the war as an excuse to advance their expansive agenda West. There were partisan divides in Congress between the Federalists who were seen to support Britain and the other interests represented by the  Democratic-Republicans led by Thomas Jefferson, who were more interested in expansionism and breaking ties with England.

Examples of National Unity:

The war was impactful in the United States because it led to the demise of the Federalist party and boosted confidence in the idea of a nation without strong ties to Britain. Winning the Battle at New Orleans, for example, helped to fuel the growing spirit of expansionism that would characterize the years up until the civil war. It also signaled a consolidation of power and opinion against the Native American communities who were being pushed West. It is a decisive turning point in the struggle of Native Americans against large-scale American expansion further West into their territories.  

3 0
3 years ago
Which best describes President Lincoln’s reaction to the formation of the Confederate States of America?
aivan3 [116]
Hi!

The answer is <span>c.He threatened war unless the South returned to the Union.

Hope this helps!

-Payshence xoxo</span>
3 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did Britain “rule” India? What methods did they use to control India? Did they rule directly, or indirectly (hands on, or ha
Tema [17]

Answer:

i can answer number 1,\

Control of India was given to a British Governor-General, who reported back to the British Parliament. It should be noted that the British Raj included only about two-thirds of modern India, with the other portions under the control of local princes. However, Britain exerted great pressure on these princes, effectively controlling all of India.

HOPE THIS HELPED !!

 <3    kaylee

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
How did India's great rulers maintain peace and order?
dangina [55]
India's great rulers maintain peace and order by enforcing laws, resisting invaders and encouraging economic growth. According to Hindu teachings, in order to become a great ruler, one should maintain peace and order by the aforementioned things. Hope this helps.
8 0
3 years ago
The constitution regulates government power by
Vika [28.1K]
Providing Guides and limits to the government's power.

Re-read the question. Hope I helped :)
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What nation emerged from world war 1 as a strengthened world power
    15·2 answers
  • How did race play a part in the euorpean colonization of africa
    11·1 answer
  • List 4 of animals that have been domesticated
    11·2 answers
  • What was George Washington's Belief about U.S foreign policy?
    14·1 answer
  • How did Napoleon take advantage of opportunities to advance his career?
    14·1 answer
  • How did world war 1 contribute to the African american great migration
    6·2 answers
  • Why are primary sources considered more reliable?​
    12·2 answers
  • How did jeffersons stance on indian removal change over time?
    13·1 answer
  • An effect of the Dred Scott
    13·1 answer
  • The Perseverance rover will NOT ____. A. Allow scientists to study how spacesuit materials hold up on Mars B. Explore a crater e
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!