It depends On my what aspect you're looking at it from. According to the theories of population growth and resources, Malthus theory states that population growth will cause resources to deplete to a point where resources (earths carrying capacity) are unable to support the population resulting in the Malthusian crisis. When the crisis happens, there will be positive checks in place such as droughts an famines to lower the population until a sustainable number for resource usage. This is supported by many Neo Malthusian theories aka modern interpretations but one main fact is that this was said in the 18 century and back then it was simply an agrarian society.
Hence there was boserup's theory which was based on necessity is the Mother of invention ( I think I got this quote wrong) and that basically when population growth increase there will be more technology and improvements to society to increase resources available for usage. Which is largely supported by the high dependence on agriculture in agriculture and technological advancements over the years such as the green revolution and industrial revolution,
Ultimately I support Malthusian theory as it makes sense that no matter what, population will always be a liability in terms of resource usage.
Robert de La Salle not right
False. You must first
investigate the person or institution before making any conclusions or judgments.
Believing in reputation alone is not enough.
Some people get a bad reputation due to the smear campaigns of others in
an attempt to discourage any kind of support.
Answer:
It would be an authoritarian government mostly likely sooner or later.
Explanation:
Answer:
this drug is definitley a game changer for everybody and needs to put out there for everybody
Explanation:
because its a cancer fighting drug... that probably has a huge street worth so i could sell some 12 year olds these... hope this helped
