Explanation: They wrote it because they wanted to establish self-government in the New World.
Answer:
a.
Explanation:
Based on the answers provided within the question it can be said that the statement that would result in cognitive dissonance would be "I believe smoking is bad for my health; I love to smoke.". That is because cognitive dissonance refers to to conflicting attitudes, beliefs, or behaviors. Therefore by saying that smoking is bad for you but either way you love to smoke then you are contradicting yourself.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
You forgot to include the options for this question. However, we can say the following.
Based on this statement, the author's point of view is the following: "the people should have more say in their government and it should work for the benefit of the people."
That is why, Mikael Gorbachev, the leader of the Soviet Union, decide to implement a series of reformations much needed in the USSR at the time. The two most important were glasnost and perestroika. Glasnosts was a political reformation that granted the Soviet people more freedoms and rights to express themselves. Perestroika was an economic reformation that allowed foreign investment to enter the Soviet markets and created many jobs.
Answer:
C) would people still conform to the group if the group opinion was clearly wrong?
Explanation:
Solomon Asch research was designed to answer a straightforward question, namely: <em>would people still conform to the group if the group opinion was clearly wrong? </em>This research was made by Asch to test conformity in ambiguous situations. Two important conclusions of the research are that people tend to conform to the majority of the group of opinion even if they know their answer is wrong, and that the size of the group is important when deciding.
Answer: A. Yes, but only against persons engaging in activities that are not constitutionally protected
Explanation:
Here are the options to the question
a.Yes, but only against persons engaging in activities that are not constitutionally protected
B Yes, against anyone because it does not prohibit a substantial amount of unprotected speech
C No, because it is unconstitutional
D No, because it is overbroad, but judged in relation to its plainly legitimate sweep