1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Leokris [45]
3 years ago
9

What factors might influence where a city would develop

Social Studies
1 answer:
Vitek1552 [10]3 years ago
7 0
<span>There are several important factors that influence where a city would develop. Factors like water source, trade routes, connectivity and location are some of the most important factors determining the position of a city. The people living in the city or the industries coming up in the city would require a constant and good source of water. So this is a very important factor. Connectivity of the city via different means of transport is another important factor. There has to be several trade routes connecting the city with other important cities.   </span>


You might be interested in
Which of the statements describes a medium-term financial goal?
GaryK [48]

Answer:

Financal plan.

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Economic system in which the factors of production are owned by the government
Hitman42 [59]

This economic system is called<em> socialism.</em>

Socialism is an economic system where everyone in the society equally owns the factors of production. The ownership as such is in the hands of the<em> government</em> that controls all means of production and distribution of goods.

The factors of production are : land, labor, capital and entrepreneurship.

In a socialistic economy, the land is owned by the state and private property is limited and difficult to obtain. Labor is heavily regulated and most people are employed in state-owned companies. Workers do not have many rights and they have to obey the government which also decides what is being produced and in which capacity ( planned economy ).

Socialism does not reward people for being entrepreneurial and competitive as competition is no existing and everybody reaps the same benefits of their work.

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Who were the regulators in the texan border?
Sladkaya [172]

The Texan Rangers were the regulators in the texan border. Regulators were Texas rangers who patrolled the streets terrorising Mexicans and hunting down American-Indian livestock rustlers. When Texas required independence from Mexico in order to operate alone as a republic, the regulators and rangers came to power.

Charles W. Jackson and Charles W. Moorman were the main Regulators commanders, and their main objective was to stop cattle rustling. But when the Regulators' acts grew out of control, a rival vigilante organisation known as the Moderators was established to "moderate" the Regulators.

To learn more Texas refer

brainly.com/question/20737446

#SPJ4

3 0
1 year ago
Is Animals were present before humans on earth..??
astra-53 [7]

Answer:

um......dinosaurs?

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
This ruling violated the recent
sammy [17]

Answer:

Maybe this will help

Explanation:

In a case later overruled by West Virginia State Board of Education v. Barnette (1943), the Supreme Court held in Minersville School District v. Gobitis, 310 U.S. 586 (1940), that state legislatures could require public school students to salute the U.S. flag and recite the Pledge of Allegiance without violating students’ speech and religious rights under the First and Fourteenth Amendments.Minersville students refused to salute the flag for religious reasons

Public school students in Minersville, Pennsylvania, were required to begin the school day by reciting the Pledge of Allegiance while saluting the flag. However, two students, Lillian and William Gobitas (a court clerk erroneously changed the family’s last name to Gobitis), refused. They claimed that such a practice violated their religious principles; they were members of Jehovah’s Witnesses, who believed that saluting the flag was tantamount to paying homage to a graven image. After the students were expelled from school, their father filed suit, claiming that his children were being denied a free education and challenging the required pledge. Both the district court and the court of appeals ruled that the required salute and pledge were unconstitutional.

Court upheld compulsory salute and pledge

In an 8-1 decision, the Supreme Court overruled the lower courts by upholding the compulsory salute and pledge. Writing for the Court, Justice Felix Frankfurter acknowledged that the First Amendment sought to avoid the “bitter religious struggles” of the past by prohibiting the establishment of a state religion and guaranteeing the free exercise of all religions. Yet the scope of this right to religious liberty could pose serious questions when, as in this case, individuals sought exemption from a generally applicable and constitutional law.

Citing a series of cases, beginning with the Court’s decision upholding anti-polygamy laws in Reynolds v. United States (1879), Frankfurter reaffirmed the principle that religious liberty had never included “exemption from doing what society thinks necessary for the promotion of some great common end, or from a penalty for conduct which appears dangerous to the general good.” In this case, the “great common end” was achieved through repetition of a “cohesive sentiment” represented by the salute and pledge to the flag, “the symbol of our national unity” that transcended all other differences.

Frankfurter defined the question in Gobitis as whether the Supreme Court could decide “the appropriateness of various means to evoke that unifying sentiment without which there can ultimately be no liberties, civil or religious,” or whether that decision should be left to the individual state legislatures and school districts. For Frankfurter and the majority of the Court, the decision obviously belonged to the legislatures and school boards. Although multiple methods were available for instilling “the common feeling for the common country” and some of those methods “may seem harsh and others no doubt are foolish,” it was for the legislatures and educators to decide, not the Court. The Constitution did not authorize the Supreme Court to become “the school board for the country.”

Stone said the compelled pledge should be unconstitutional

In his dissent, Justice Harlan Fiske Stone presaged the Court’s opinion three years later in West Virginia State Board of Education v. Barnette (1943) that would overrule the Gobitis decision. Conceding that constitutional guarantees of personal liberty are “not always absolutes,” Stone wrote that when legitimate conflicts arise between liberty and authority, the Court should seek “reasonable accommodation between them so as to preserve the essentials of both.” The Constitution did not indicate in any way that “compulsory expressions of loyalty play any . . .

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What term refers to the strength of opinion on given issue
    8·1 answer
  • Duke plans on majoring in accounting because he is confident that an ability to read and interpret financial and accounting data
    8·2 answers
  • Writting about how people communicate in the future ?
    15·1 answer
  • Which part of the plant develops into the primary root? Select one of the options below as your answer:
    12·2 answers
  • Trisha's community has many ozone action days. On these days, the amount of ozone in the air can build to dangerous levels. What
    9·1 answer
  • What are some limits of the local government especially in the times of civic unrest
    7·1 answer
  • Please l want notes about photosynthesis​
    11·1 answer
  • Use each of these words in a sentence.
    7·1 answer
  • Describe TWO things about the laws in the United States that Abigail Adams most likely wanted to change during her lifetime.
    6·2 answers
  • Someone please help me with this
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!