All categories

4 years ago

1. Katie worked 8 hours and was paid $74. Tim was paid $9.00 per hour. Who made more money per hour?

1 answer:

5 0

Katie made more money. Her hourly rate was $9.25 per hour . It already tells you how much Tim make an hour so all you have to figure out is how much Katie makes . 74 divided by 8 gives you 9.25 .

You might be interested in

4 (k - 6) = 6 (-4 - 5k)<br> a) 10<br> b) 0<br> c) -2<br> d) 8

user100 [1]

Step-by-step explanation:

step 1. what is the question? solve for k? okay.

step 2. 4(k - 6) = 6(-4 - 5k)

step 3. 4k - 24 = -24 - 30k

step 4. 34k = 0

step 5. k = 0.

3 0

3 years ago

What dilation happened below

AleksAgata [21]

Answer:

Dilation of 3

Step-by-step explanation:

7 0

3 years ago

Is this the correct answer?

Westkost [7]

To be honest, these answer choices are a bit baffling. The best answer in my opinion would be to do at least two of the three options given below.

Place a price floor above the equilibrium.
Decrease imports from other countries.
Reduce current supply (reduce herd sizes).

Doing that should increase the prices.

Placing a floor above equilibrium will force the equilibrium to move upward, and with the reduce in supply from other countries, demand will shift toward the domestic producers. Without the demand shift, there simply would be an oversupply or surplus of dairy. Either the surplus is thrown away or its simply housed somewhere else (often at taxpayer expense).

---------------

If you place a ceiling below equilibrium, then the price will go down to that ceiling value. That will be the highest price possible. This is the opposite of what the farmers want. It gets even worse when you increase milk imports (since supply goes up leading to further reduced prices). So that rules out choice A.

If you place a ceiling above equilibrium, then nothing happens. The price stays at equilibrium. Nothing too exciting here. This rules out choice B (though I agree with the "decrease imports" portion).

If you set a floor below equilibrium, then nothing happens similar to the last paragraph above. The price stays where it is. We can rule out choice C. Reducing herd sizes will reduce supply so that could maybe increase prices.

I'm not really familiar with the term "arbitrage" so I probably won't be any help here. That seems like an answer choice that is a distraction, but I'm not sure.

5 0

3 years ago

1. Given points A(3, -5) and B(19, -1), find the coordinates of point C that sit 3/8 of the way along line AB, closer to A than

zaharov [31]

1. C(x, y) = (7.3, –3.9)

2. C(x, y) = (17, –1.5)

Solution:

Question 1:

Let the points are A(3, –5) and B(19, –1).

C is the point that on the segment AB in the fraction $\frac{3}{8}$ .

Point divides segment in the ratio formula:

$$C(x, y)=\left(\frac{mx_2+nx_1}{m+n} , \frac{my_2+ny_1}{m+n}\right)$

Here, $x_1=3, y_1=-5, x_2=19, y_2=-1$ and m = 3, n = 8

$$C(x, y)=\left(\frac{3\times19+8\times3}{3+8} , \frac{3\times(-1)+8\times(-5)}{3+8}\right)$

$$=\left(\frac{57+24}{11} , \frac{-3-40}{11}\right)$

$$=\left(\frac{81}{11} , \frac{-43}{11}\right)$

C(x, y) = (7.3, –3.9)

Question 2:

Let the points are A(3, –5) and B(19, –1).

C is the point that on the segment AB in the fraction $\frac{3}{8}$ .

Point divides segment in the ratio formula:

$$C(x, y)=\left(\frac{mx_2+nx_1}{m+n} , \frac{my_2+ny_1}{m+n}\right)$

Here, $x_1=3, y_1=-5, x_2=19, y_2=-1$ and m = 7, n = 1

$$C(x, y)=\left(\frac{7\times19+1\times3}{7+1} , \frac{7\times(-1)+1\times(-5)}{7+1}\right)$

$$=\left(\frac{133+3}{8} , \frac{-7-5}{8}\right)$

$$=\left(\frac{136}{8} , \frac{-12}{8}\right)$

C(x, y) = (17, –1.5)

8 0

4 years ago

PLZZZZ HELP If Tyler deposits $1500 of the $3200 he has earned in an account that pays 4% simple interest, how much will he have

mash [69]

$\bf \qquad \textit{Simple Interest Earned Amount}\\\\
A=P(1+rt)\qquad 
\begin{cases}
A=\textit{accumulated amount}\\
P=\textit{original amount deposited}\to& \$1500\\
r=rate\to 4\%\to \frac{4}{100}\to &0.04\\
t=years\to &5
\end{cases}
\\\\\\
A=1500(1+0.04\cdot 5)\implies A=1800$

now, he had 3200, he took 1500 for deposit, so, 3200 - 1500, he had left in his pocket 1700.

so after 5 years, he'll have 1700 + 1800.

8 0

4 years ago