a = amount invested at 7%
b = amount invested at 9%
we know the amount invested was ₹36000, thus we know that whatever "a" and "b" are, a + b = 36000. We can also say that

since we know the interest earned from the invested was ₹2920, then we say that 0.07a + 0.09b = 2920.
![\begin{cases} a + b = 36000\\\\ 0.07a+0.09b=2920 \end{cases} \\\\[-0.35em] ~\dotfill\\\\ \stackrel{\textit{using the 1st equation}}{a + b = 36000\implies \underline{b = 36000-a}}~\hfill \stackrel{\textit{substituting on the 2nd equation}}{0.07a~~ + ~~0.09(\underline{36000-a})~~ = ~~2920} \\\\\\ 0.07a+3240-0.09a=2920\implies 3240-0.02a=2920\implies -0.02a=-320 \\\\\\ a=\cfrac{-320}{-0.02}\implies \boxed{a=16000}~\hfill \boxed{\stackrel{36000~~ - ~~16000}{20000=b}}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cbegin%7Bcases%7D%20a%20%2B%20b%20%3D%2036000%5C%5C%5C%5C%200.07a%2B0.09b%3D2920%20%5Cend%7Bcases%7D%20%5C%5C%5C%5C%5B-0.35em%5D%20~%5Cdotfill%5C%5C%5C%5C%20%5Cstackrel%7B%5Ctextit%7Busing%20the%201st%20equation%7D%7D%7Ba%20%2B%20b%20%3D%2036000%5Cimplies%20%5Cunderline%7Bb%20%3D%2036000-a%7D%7D~%5Chfill%20%5Cstackrel%7B%5Ctextit%7Bsubstituting%20on%20the%202nd%20equation%7D%7D%7B0.07a~~%20%2B%20~~0.09%28%5Cunderline%7B36000-a%7D%29~~%20%3D%20~~2920%7D%20%5C%5C%5C%5C%5C%5C%200.07a%2B3240-0.09a%3D2920%5Cimplies%203240-0.02a%3D2920%5Cimplies%20-0.02a%3D-320%20%5C%5C%5C%5C%5C%5C%20a%3D%5Ccfrac%7B-320%7D%7B-0.02%7D%5Cimplies%20%5Cboxed%7Ba%3D16000%7D~%5Chfill%20%5Cboxed%7B%5Cstackrel%7B36000~~%20-%20~~16000%7D%7B20000%3Db%7D%7D)
The additional information that would allow us to prove that the image is a parallelogram is that; Line EJ ≅ Line GJ
<h3>How to prove a Parallelogram?</h3>
The six basic properties of parallelograms are primarily;
- Both pairs of opposite sides are parallel
- Both pairs of opposite sides are congruent
- Both pairs of opposite angles are congruent
- Diagonals bisect each other
- One angle is supplementary to both consecutive angles (same-side interior)
- One pair of opposite sides are congruent AND parallel.
Now, looking at the parallelogram properties above and comparing with the given image of the quadrilateral attached, we can say that the additional information that would allow us to prove that the image is a parallelogram is that; Line EJ ≅ Line GJ
Read more about Parallelogram Proof at; brainly.com/question/24056495
#SPJ1
Answer:
yes
Step-by-step explanation:
All I know is they can’t be parallel because they don’t have the same gradient. I don’t think they are perpendicular either but don’t fully trust me on that