1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Zielflug [23.3K]
3 years ago
15

Abraham Maslow suggested that "a person who is lacking food, love, and self-esteem would most likely hunger for food more strong

ly than anything else." Give evidence that would lead you to support this statement and give two examples that are exceptions to Maslow's theory
Social Studies
1 answer:
Nimfa-mama [501]3 years ago
3 0

In this statement, Maslow is arguing that not all of our needs are equally important. Some needs, such as food or thirst, are our priority, and only when we satisfy these do we begin to think about others such as love and self-esteem.

An example that shows this are people who live in extreme poverty and steal food. People in this situation would rather compromise their safety, freedom and maybe even self-worth in order to satisfy their hunger.

However, some evidence points to the opposite as well. For example, soldiers who join the war do so to fulfill abstract needs such as earning respect and finding meaning, even if this means risking their safety, having little to eat and facing many uncomfortable situations. Another example is athletes. Athletes train to a degree that is uncomfortable and hard. They also limit their food intake to certain types of food in order to achieve goals such as self-fulfillment and a higher self-esteem.

You might be interested in
What is a principle of government that is stated in the preamble to the united states constitution
Annette [7]
Democracy is non negotiable 
4 0
3 years ago
I’m back hvuhvjhvjhvjhvhjvjhvhjvhjv
Klio2033 [76]

Answer:

Welcome back

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is meant by "no change though you lie under the land you used to plough"? his fields have not been touched since he died. l
tester [92]

Answer:

life has gone on without him

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Can someone plz go on my page and answer my most recent questions 15 Points
Lemur [1.5K]

Answer:

I will!

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Federal vs State government essay
Igoryamba

Each state has their own specific unique laws established individually for their state. In conjunction with those laws that exist over the people in their specific state there are also federal laws that govern the states as well as the people who live in them. These laws that govern the people are known as state laws and federal laws. The U.S. Constitution is the supreme law of the land in the United States. “It creates a federal system of government in which power is shared between the federal government and the state governments. Due to federalism, both the federal government and each of the state governments have their own court systems (Comparing State & Federal Courts, 2013)”.

The Constitution provides the federal government the authority it needs to handle the nations international affairs as they deal with foreign policy, this enables the federal government to create and establish the national defense needs of the nation, and it also allows them the power to handle and deal with the issues which are currency related inside the nation. The federal government is superior to state government, and, because of this federal law will override state law.

The Fourteenth Amendment in the United States Constitution designates that the Bill of Rights valid in each state. According to the Constitution federal law is designated to govern items passed in legislation by the United States Congress, and federal law is meant to govern the executive decisions and orders made by the president of the United States. Federal law is also meant to uphold the decisions made by the federal courts according to the rules outlined in the Constitution. The United States Supreme Court is used as the final arbiter for resolution in cases in which the concern is federal law, and federal laws are codified in the United States code and are more powerful and hold a greater weight than the state law (FindLaw, 2012).

State law in short, is the law of the land that governs each state separately. Each state has their own unique designs of laws and each state has their own laws, which are created in their own legislation. The laws that each state creates are created as a bill and passed in each individual state by his or her own state legislature and are approved and signed by the specific state’s governor. The problem with their relationship is that habitually while there is a requirement to exist in general they cannot coexist and when this happens conflicts arise. When conflicts arise the problems are generally taken to federal courts to attempt to find a resolution (The Federal Legal System, 2014).

According to Cornell University Law (2012), “Furthermore, all federal, state, and local officials must take an oath to support the Constitution. This means that state governments and officials cannot take actions or pass laws that interfere with the Constitution, laws passed by Congress, or treaties. The Constitution was interpreted, in 1819, as giving the Supreme Court the power to invalidate any state actions that interfere with the Constitution and the laws and treaties passed pursuant to it.

The general concern with the medical marijuana problem is that although some states have made it a legal substance, which could indeed be used for medical purposes, the fact still remains that even though states have made it legal by federal law, it is a substance that is illegal. Some states have chosen to take the initiative to make marijuana and its sell and distribution legal as long as a doctor is treating those purchasing it and have a legitimate need for it (NCSL, 2014).

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Excluding children from participation in research, while well intentioned, may deny children the benefits of participation and p
    5·1 answer
  • How are loans and grants different?
    8·2 answers
  • Check the one thing that is NOT true about the Electoral College. The College is made up of people selected by the states. Those
    13·2 answers
  • A COTA is working with a child on tooth brushing. The COTA lets the child brush the teeth for a minute. The child fails to brush
    6·1 answer
  • The middle tier of the federal court system is made up of the ________________.
    8·1 answer
  • What is the setting in a drama?
    6·2 answers
  • What resulted from the conflict created by the Tariff of 1828?
    9·2 answers
  • Please answe fast!
    15·2 answers
  • Why is the Underground Railroad a source of pride for Vincent Brown?
    14·1 answer
  • Why were the Caribbean islands not as united as the mainland colonies
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!