Okay here is how Scienists can be sharing their research and findings for some funding purposes. <u>Most federally-funded agencies want the public to know about the work they are supporting. It helps give agencies the political support they need to get additional funding in the future.</u> The National Science Foundation (NSF), for example, uses its <u>Science360 site</u> to share a wide variety of <u>science stories </u>– including stories about research findings that weren’t funded by NSF. They also can create several opportunities for formal collaborations, I can think of several instances where <u>publicizing the findings of one research project has led to an invitation for a researcher to be part of a new or emerging research project.</u> Very often, these take the form of interinstitutional and or interdisciplinary grant proposals. <u><em>Point is Scientists sharing their collective information, test results, experiments, and study's, etc;</em></u> can really bring new questions and answers to further scientific questions and scientific anomalies we still don't understand out there or haven't discovered yet, and to improve our understanding of the things we may see daily and can't explain what they are or things we may find in our backyard that we can't comprehend will definitely need some sort of studying to be done in order to understand our un ordinary world we live in and improve our knowledge on things we may encounter that we just don't understand.
The answer is definitely "D"
Answer:
Naming binary (two-element) covalent compounds is similar to naming simple ionic compounds. The first element in the formula is simply listed using the name of the element. The second element is named by taking the stem of the element name and adding the suffix
This is True. Translocation is the movement materials from leaves to other tissues. :)
Answer:
The brown eye gene is stronger than the blue eye gene.