1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
o-na [289]
3 years ago
9

Which argument is true for the classical theory of criminology

Law
1 answer:
Oksana_A [137]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

The question is incomplete. These are the claims of the Classical Theory of Criminology;

  • The first basic claim made by the classical theory of crime causation is that human beings are fundamentally rational, and most human behavior is the result of free will and rational choice.
  • The classical theory believes that crime is a result of pain and pleasure which are the two central determinants of human behavior.
  • The classical theory of crime causation is that to deter law violators punishment must be meted accordingly to serve as an example to others who would also violate this law.
  • The classical theory of crime causation also believes that it cannot be denied that the root principles of right and wrong are in the nature of things.
  • Also according to the classical theory, crime is an immoral behavior degrades the relationship quality  that exists between individuals and society.

Explanation:

The classical theory is a school of thought popular in 18th century Europe. It believes that criminals were rational and that the severity of legal punishment should be restricted to the degree necessary for deterrence.

There are five key principles to understanding the classical school of thought. They are;  Rationality, Hedonism, punishment and human rights

You might be interested in
When policymakers are considering a particular action, they can use consumer surplus as a(n) A. objective measure of the benefit
kramer

Answer:

D. Both b) and c) are correct.

Explanation:

Consumer surplus is the difference between the total profit we get from service and its market price. This means that the first unit to acquire we value it highly but as we acquire additional units our valuation falls. However, the price we pay for any unit is always the same.

Thanks for your question!

6 0
4 years ago
Raymond Zukaitis was a physician practicing medicine in Douglas County, Nebraska. Aetna issued a policy of professional liabilit
ICE Princess25 [194]

Answer: The physician is being sued. Insurance company should provide an attorney. If the doctor is negligent, insurance company should pay (that's why we have premiums). Dr. Z is sued, goes to agency, and notifies the agency. The agency doesn't notify Aetna in right amount of time, and also notifies the wrong company. Aetna doesn't have a liability because they were not notified in a timely manner. Larson is agent to Aetna. A principal's notice to agent=notice to principal. That's the same as notifying Aetna according to its claims procedure. This is not Dr.Z's problem. Aetna is wrong in denying coverage, and Dr.Z will succeed and not have to pay.

8 0
4 years ago
specific powers granted to congress as outlined in article 1, section 8 of the untied states constitution
bearhunter [10]

Answer:

cade o artigo 1 para eu poder responder

8 0
3 years ago
Hi this is all a misunderstanding i am in fact 13 years old and i accidentally pressed "the under 13" choice. Now i can't login
jeyben [28]

Answer:

Hey I'm 13 to lol that sucks

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Provide two examples of real-life instances where you engaged in an error in reasoning and, as a result, came to a faulty conclu
Molodets [167]

Two examples of real-life instances where a person might engage in an error in reasoning and, as a result, come to a faulty conclusion about something that they observed are:

1. Concluding that a person is harsh because his face is not cheerful.

2. Predicting that it will rain because the weather is gloomy.

<h3>What is a Faulty Conclusion?</h3>

A faulty conclusion is reached when the pattern of reasoning is faulty. Before a conclusion can be reached on a matter, it is vital to test the observations beyond all reasonable doubts.

If this is not done, the probability of reaching a faulty conclusion will be high.

Learn more about faulty conclusions here:

brainly.com/question/2141635

5 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Outline the process by which most federal judges are nominated and approved
    14·1 answer
  • Which goal of foreign policy relates to protecting the safety of Americans? (3 points)
    9·2 answers
  • What are formal norms called?
    10·2 answers
  • Which of the following positions is considered to be a chief officer? (There may be more than one.)
    15·1 answer
  • Knock knock?
    7·2 answers
  • One of the results of the Schneck decision was that it removed protections for
    11·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELP, WILL MARK BRAINLEST
    6·1 answer
  • The Junior Reserve Officer Training Corps (JROTC) is a training program offered in many high schools. Conduct online research an
    11·1 answer
  • By european law, feta cheese can only be called feta if it is produced in what country?
    9·1 answer
  • a body of law that deals with the rights and responsibilities of citizens and that formalizes the duties owed to others by prote
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!