Answer:
$65,000
Explanation:
Borasco was the person who purchased the land for $65,000 in which the land was later transferred to Alvo. Therefore no gain or loss is been recognized in this liquidation because it subsidiary is been liquidated by the parent which is why the basis of land is said to be carryover basis of $65,000 at the end of the transaction.
Answer:
Georgeland has an absolute but not a comparative advantage in producing clothing.
Explanation:
Absolute advantage is defined as the ability of a firm to produce higher amounts of a product as a result of use of the same resources with other competitors. It is usually bad a result of more efficient production process.
Comparative advantage is the ability of a firm to produce goods at a lower opportunity cost. Therefore they are able to sell at lower price compared to competitors.
Georgeland can produce 18 units of clothe per year while Alland can produce 16 units per year, so Georgeland has absolute advantage.
In producing clothes Georgeland has opportunity cost of 36 units of food which is higher than that of Alland which is 32 units of food. So Georgeland does not have comparative advantage in producing clothes.
It should be noted that contract or event profile is usually stipulated in writing all the client's requirements and gives all of the relevant information.
An event profile can be regarded as set of event scripts, which helps to give description about an event.
This profile or contract do list out all the requirements that is needed by a company from the client in executing their services.
Therefore, contract or event profile serves all the client's requirements and gives all of the relevant information.
Learn more about contract or event profile at:
brainly.com/question/24858866
Answer:
a. 1.51 containers
b. Fewer
Explanation:
The computations are shown below:
a. The number of containers would be
= Annual demand × time × (1 + inefficiency factor) ÷ holding pieces
= 70 × 0.75 × (1 + 0.15) ÷ 40
= 1.51 containers
The time is converted from minutes to hour i.e 45 minutes ÷ 60 minutes = 0.75
b. If the system improves, the fewer containers are required i.e 2 containers approximate because inefficiency factor got decreased
Answer:
166.25 hours
Explanation:
It take 25 hours if the production is going at 100% capacity, but the production is only going at 67%, therefore, 33% of the capacity is under utilized. It takes 8.25 more hours to finish the unit since the capacity is only at 67%. Finally, it takes 25+8.25 hours to finish a single product, hence taking 166.25 hours for 5 units.
We do this like this:
--> 25 ------ 100
--> X ------ 33
--> 33*25 = 100*X
--> 825/100
--> X=8.25
Hope this clears everything. Thankyou.