Answer:
D. Replacement cost.
Explanation:
As we know that the inventory should be recorded at the cost or market value whichever is lower
Given that
Original cost is less than the net realizable value subtract the profit margin
So we assume the following figures
Original cost $10
Net realizable value 9
Replacement cost 8
NRV less normal profit margin 7
As if we compare the original cost and replacement cost so the lower value is of replacement cost
hence, the same is to be considered
Therefore the correct option is D.
Answer:
lump sum money= $52653
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
Your child is going to college in 4 years.
Tuition fees amount to $16,000 a year for each of the 4 years.
You plan on depositing a lump sum of money today in a bank account paying 5% interest a year.
The first tuition fee payment you make will be 4 years from now.
FV= 16000*4= $64000
n= 4 years
i= 0.05
We need to find the annual payments:
PV= FV/(1+i)^n
PV= 64000/1.05^4= $52653
When four infineon technologies executives participated in an international conspiracy to fix prices for computer memory chips, they were acting with other firms as a cartel.
Given an incomplete sentence related to infineon technologies.
We are required to fill the sentence by an appropriate term.
We can fill the sentence with "a cartel".
A cartel is basically a formal agreement among firms in an oligopolistic industry. Members of cartel may agree on such matters as prices, total industry output, market shares, allocation of customers, allocation of territories, bid-rigging, establishment of common sales agencies, and the division of profits or combination of these. It is basically a group of people who are collected to complete an objective.
Hence when four infineon technologies executives participated in an international conspiracy to fix prices for computer memory chips, they were acting with other firms as a cartel.
Learn more about cartel at brainly.com/question/12015868
#SPJ4
<span>In this case, the transfer could be considered voidable by the trustees. This is because Shirley did not receive the fair value for the car, but simply received a negligible amount as a way of trying to defraud her creditors. In this case, the transfer could be voided.</span>
