Answer:
875 ft²
Step-by-step explanation:
Finding area of similar rectangles:
Scale factor = EF : AB
= 25 : 5
= 5 : 1
![\sf \dfrac{Area \ of \ bigger \ rectangle}{Area \ of \ smaller \ rectangle}= (Scale \ factor)^2](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Csf%20%5Cdfrac%7BArea%20%5C%20of%20%5C%20bigger%20%5C%20rectangle%7D%7BArea%20%5C%20of%20%5C%20smaller%20%5C%20rectangle%7D%3D%20%28Scale%20%5C%20factor%29%5E2)
![\dfrac{Area \ of \ bigger \ rectangle}{35} =\left(\dfrac{5}{1}\right)^2](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cdfrac%7BArea%20%5C%20of%20%5C%20bigger%20%5C%20%20rectangle%7D%7B35%7D%20%3D%5Cleft%28%5Cdfrac%7B5%7D%7B1%7D%5Cright%29%5E2)
![\text{Area of bigger rectangle = $\dfrac{25}{1}*35$}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Ctext%7BArea%20of%20bigger%20rectangle%20%3D%20%24%5Cdfrac%7B25%7D%7B1%7D%2A35%24%7D)
Area or rectangle EFGH = 875 ft²
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Hello, please consider the following.
![3\cdot 4^n+51=3\cdot 4^n+3\cdot 17=3(4^n+17)](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=3%5Ccdot%204%5En%2B51%3D3%5Ccdot%204%5En%2B3%5Ccdot%2017%3D3%284%5En%2B17%29)
So this is divisible by 3.
Now, to prove that this is divisible by 9 = 3*3 we need to prove that
is divisible by 3. We will prove it by induction.
Step 1 - for n = 1
4+17=21= 3*7 this is true
Step 2 - we assume this is true for k so
is divisible by 3
and we check what happens for k+1
![4^{k+1}+17=4\cdot 4^k+17=3\cdot 4^k + 4^k+17](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=4%5E%7Bk%2B1%7D%2B17%3D4%5Ccdot%204%5Ek%2B17%3D3%5Ccdot%204%5Ek%20%2B%204%5Ek%2B17)
is divisible by 3 and
is divisible by 3, by induction hypothesis
So, the sum is divisible by 3.
Step 3 - Conclusion
We just prove that
is divisible by 3 for all positive integers n.
Thanks
Answer:
360
Step-by-step explanation:
There are 60 minutes in 1 hour, so 2 hours = 120 minutes.
Multiply 120 by 3 and you get 360.
They would burn 360 calories doing 2 hours of bowling.
D
is certainly wrong. You could extend the length of AD as far as you want and the two triangles (ABD and ACD) would still be congruent.
C
is wrong as well. The triangles might be similar, but they are more. They are congruent.
B
You don't have to prove that. It is given on the way the diagram is marked.
A
A is your answer. The two triangles are congruent by SAS
I'd definitely factor 4x^2-48 first. Factors are (4)(x^2-12).
This factors further: (4)* (x-2sqrt(3) ) * (x+2sqrt(3) )