1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
SCORPION-xisa [38]
3 years ago
6

Pls help! I just need help

Law
1 answer:
amm18123 years ago
8 0

Answer: C. The Supreme Court ruled that Dred Scott was not entitled to the rights of citizenship, which inflamed sectional tensions that eventually led to the outbreak of the Civil War.

Details:

Dred Scott was a slave who had been owned by a Missouri man named John Emerson.  Emerson's service in the US military caused him to live for a time in Illinois (which was a free state) and Wisconsin (which was a free territory.  Later, back in Missouri, after John Emerson died, Scott tried to purchase his freedom from Emerson's widow, who refused.  With lawyers' help, he then filed suit to gain his freedom on the grounds that he had lived in a free state and free territory.

In Dred Scott  v. Sandford (1857), commonly referred to simply as "The Dred Scott case," the Supreme Court, by a 7 to 2 margin, issued its ruling that Scott was not  entitled to his freedom just because he had lived at some times in free territory.  The Court also ruled that African Americans were not and could never be citizens of the United States, and therefore did not have the legal standing to file such a lawsuit.  The Court further stated that the Missouri Compromise of 1820 had been an overreach of federal government power -- that any states or territories were free to make their own decisions regarding slavery.

The Dred Scott decision was a controversial event which played into the tensions that by 1861 erupted into the Civil War in the United States.

Read more on Brainly.com - brainly.com/question/10791169#readmore

You might be interested in
Which of the following will help sober up and lower the BAL of an intoxicated person?
Anit [1.1K]

Answer:

Not a cold shower. That could throw them into shock. Time is a no brainier that doesn't work very efficiently. Exercise is the most efficient way.

7 0
3 years ago
Damian owns a small business with about 20 employees. He knows that pilferage can cost his company a lot over the course of a ye
const2013 [10]
He can install cameras so that way if anyone steals anything it will be caught on camera so A
4 0
3 years ago
Consumer protection laws, which commonly regulate the form of consumer contracts, provide that back-page disclaimers are void if
Goshia [24]

The answer would be true

6 0
3 years ago
In the space below, write a 250-word essay discussing the nature of pro bono service for lawyers and why it is an important part
bekas [8.4K]
Tiktok charli damelio law
3 0
3 years ago
Sabine came from the Czech Republic to the United States to work as an au pair, or so she thought. When she arrived, she was tak
frozen [14]

Answer:

The thread used against Sabine comes under Debt Trafficking.

Explanation:

Debt Trafficking:

When the human traffickers perform illicit relocation of the women saying them to pay off their debt after starting working at new location in some honorable business, But on their relocation, they force them into the prostitution business to pay their unlawful debt.

Debt Bondage:

It is debt which some labor contractor pays to some person and in return the person willingly delivers his services to pay his debt to the contractor

Debt Peonage:

It is the debt which first person pays to the second person and if the second person remains unsuccessful in paying his debt, the first person forces the second person to work for him at some minimal wage rate. In this way the second person becomes the victim of debt peonage.

After understanding the aforementioned concepts of three different types of debts, we conclude that the thread used against Sabine comes under Debt Trafficking.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Name the two factors that give federal courts jurisdiction over a case. Give an example of each.
    8·1 answer
  • Cristina is packing up some evidence in a case she was working on. She got a strange request from the prosecutor: “Witness would
    11·1 answer
  • - During the Industrial Revolution in Europe,
    10·1 answer
  • A serious incident occurred regarding theft of medical records. After the incident was near completion, law enforcement was brou
    9·1 answer
  • Which kind of question would a civil trial most likely try to answer?
    10·2 answers
  • A fellow employee, who is a disabled veteran, is complaining to you that she feels she was discriminated against in not getting
    10·1 answer
  • Is this constitutional? <br> Explain answer using the case provided.
    10·1 answer
  • 1 - 17 + 1 is what????????
    6·2 answers
  • Why does the growth of international trade lead to a rising global standard of
    13·1 answer
  • A man lends his handgun to his brother who says he will use it to hold up a local convenience store. The man is aware of his bro
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!