1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Orlov [11]
3 years ago
10

Which of the following is NOT true about a joint and survivor annuity benefit option?

Law
1 answer:
PIT_PIT [208]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

The CORRECT answer is C. Payments stop after the first death among the annuitants.

Explanation:

Hopefully this helps!!

Let me know if you still need help or if you have any questions!

You might be interested in
What does the Supreme Court have the power to do?
Ipatiy [6.2K]

Answer:

A lot!

Explanation:

Supreme Court Background

Article III of the Constitution establishes the federal judiciary. Article III, Section I states that "The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish." Although the Constitution establishes the Supreme Court, it permits Congress to decide how to organize it. Congress first exercised this power in the Judiciary Act of 1789. This Act created a Supreme Court with six justices. It also established the lower federal court system.

The Justices

Over the years, various Acts of Congress have altered the number of seats on the Supreme Court, from a low of five to a high of 10. Shortly after the Civil War, the number of seats on the Court was fixed at nine. Today, there is one Chief Justice and eight Associate Justices of the United States Supreme Court. Like all federal judges, justices are appointed by the President and are confirmed by the Senate. They, typically, hold office for life. The salaries of the justices cannot be decreased during their term of office. These restrictions are meant to protect the independence of the judiciary from the political branches of government.

The Court's Jurisdiction

Article III, Section II of the Constitution establishes the jurisdiction (legal ability to hear a case) of the Supreme Court. The Court has original jurisdiction (a case is tried before the Court) over certain cases, e.g., suits between two or more states and/or cases involving ambassadors and other public ministers. The Court has appellate jurisdiction (the Court can hear the case on appeal) on almost any other case that involves a point of constitutional and/or federal law. Some examples include cases to which the United States is a party, cases involving Treaties, and cases involving ships on the high seas and navigable waterways (admiralty cases).

Cases

When exercising its appellate jurisdiction, the Court, with a few exceptions, does not have to hear a case. The Certiorari Act of 1925 gives the Court the discretion to decide whether or not to do so. In a petition for a writ of certiorari, a party asks the Court to review its case. The Supreme Court agrees to hear about 100-150 of the more than 7,000 cases that it is asked to review each year.

Judicial Review

The best-known power of the Supreme Court is judicial review, or the ability of the Court to declare a Legislative or Executive act in violation of the Constitution, is not found within the text of the Constitution itself. The Court established this doctrine in the case of Marbury v. Madison (1803).

In this case, the Court had to decide whether an Act of Congress or the Constitution was the supreme law of the land. The Judiciary Act of 1789 gave the Supreme Court original jurisdiction to issue writs of mandamus (legal orders compelling government officials to act in accordance with the law). A suit was brought under this Act, but the Supreme Court noted that the Constitution did not permit the Court to have original jurisdiction in this matter. Since Article VI of the Constitution establishes the Constitution as the Supreme Law of the Land, the Court held that an Act of Congress that is contrary to the Constitution could not stand. In subsequent cases, the Court also established its authority to strike down state laws found to be in violation of the Constitution.

Before the passage of the Fourteenth Amendment (1869), the provisions of the Bill of Rights were only applicable to the federal government. After the Amendment's passage, the Supreme Court began ruling that most of its provisions were applicable to the states as well. Therefore, the Court has the final say over when a right is protected by the Constitution or when a Constitutional right is violated.

Role

The Supreme Court plays a very important role in our constitutional system of government. First, as the highest court in the land, it is the court of last resort for those looking for justice. Second, due to its power of judicial review, it plays an essential role in ensuring that each branch of government recognizes the limits of its own power. Third, it protects civil rights and liberties by striking down laws that violate the Constitution. Finally, it sets appropriate limits on democratic government by ensuring that popular majorities cannot pass laws that harm and/or take undue advantage of unpopular minorities. In essence, it serves to ensure that the changing views of a majority do not undermine the fundamental values common to all Americans, i.e., freedom of speech, freedom of religion, and due process of law.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
When a court hands down a decision for lower courts to follow
Hunter-Best [27]
It’s probably the Supreme court
3 0
3 years ago
Mr. Nguyen understands that Medicare prescription drug plans can use a formulary or list of covered drugs. He is suspicious abou
dimaraw [331]

Answer:

He should be made to understand that formularies must be developed with input from health practitioners such as pharmacists,doctors, etc.

Explanation:

Mr. Nguyen is suspicious about how plans establish these formularies. His suspicions should be allayed by explaining the basic principles of how formularies are established.

This involves the input of Health practitioners or experts who focus on various properties of the formularies to ensure it has a high efficacy and fit for consumption.

6 0
3 years ago
Question 5(Multiple Choice Worth 5 points) During which phase of a trial is evidence given in the attempt to convince the judge
soldi70 [24.7K]

Answer:

Preliminary hearing.

Explanation:

A preliminary hearing in criminal litigation is commonly referred to as a prelim and is the legal process of a "trial before the trial" of an accused or the defendant.

This simply means that, at the preliminary hearing, the judge using the "probable cause" legal standard, decides whether there is enough evidence to warrant the defendant to stand trial but not to determine whether he or she is guilty or innocent of the crime. Thus, no jury is present or required at this phase of trial because the defendant isn't entitled to any at the preliminary hearing.

Additionally, during the preliminary hearing phase of a trial, evidence is given in the attempt to convince the judge that there is enough evidence to go to trial. A prosecutor on behalf of the government may call witnesses to testify against the defendant and even present physical evidence to the judge, so that the case may go to trial while the defense counsel will work towards having the case dismissed by cross examining the government witnesses and disputing any evidence presented.

6 0
3 years ago
Many countries struggle with the issue of immigration, illustrating a strongly perceived ______ distinction.
Morgarella [4.7K]

Many countries struggle with the issue of immigration, illustrating a strongly perceived <u>in-group/out-group</u> distinction.

<h3>What does in-group and out-group refers to?</h3>

An in-group is a social group that a person mentally identifies with in sociology and social psychology. An out-group, on the other hand, is a social group with which a person does not identify. People may identify, for instance, with their peer group, family, neighborhood, sports team, political party, gender, sexual orientation, race, religion, or country. Numerous occurrences have been discovered to be correlated with psychological membership in social groups and categories.

Henri Tajfel and associates developed social identity theory in the 1970s, which led to the widespread use of the concept. A technique known as the minimal group paradigm was used to determine the importance of in-group and out-group classification.

To learn more about in-group and out-group from given link

brainly.com/question/7548841

#SPJ4

6 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Under what authority did Gibbons and Ogden operate their ferry services?
    15·1 answer
  • El sector terciario tiene que ver con los servicios publicos, por lo tanto aqui en nuestro municipio el encargado de este servic
    10·1 answer
  • These attorneys have a high turnover rate and are known for learning the job
    5·2 answers
  • A small cruise ship struck a whale swimming underwater, causing the ship to suddenly lurch sideways. A passenger on the ship who
    10·1 answer
  • If y'all could vote who would you vote for and why?
    12·1 answer
  • Which level of government determines who has the capacity to marry?
    15·1 answer
  • Which of the following best describes the image and its creator?
    13·2 answers
  • Badger Bank and Trust (Badger) is a community bank in Oshkosh, Wisconsin. Badger loaned $5,000 to Plessy and charged him an inte
    15·1 answer
  • If you can create an online identity that is different from who you are in the offline world, do the rules for doing what is rig
    10·1 answer
  • A person who believes an agency has violated his or her userra rights may file a complaint with the veterans employment and trai
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!