Answer:
Follows are the instructions to this question:
Explanation:
Given:
Configuration of machine = 
Machine hours= 
Order on Packing= 
We have to use the following formula in order to measure the expected production overhead rate:
Estimated overhead production rate= Total projected production expenses and for period/Total base allocation sum
Machine Configuration 
Machining hour= 
Packing
Answer:
Year Cashflow [email protected]% PV
$ $
0 (750,000) 1 (750,000)
1 350,000 0.9259 324,065
2 325,000 0.8573 278,623
3 250,000 0.7938 198.450
4 180,000 0.7350 132,300
NPV 184,438
The correct answer is D. The difference in answers is due to rounding error.
Explanation:
Net present value is the diffrence between initial outlay and present value of inflow. We need to discount the cash inflows for year 1 to year 4 at 8% and then calculate the present value of cash inflows by multiplying the cash inflows by the discount factors. Finally, we will calculate NPV by deducting the initial outlay from the present value of cash inflows.
Answer:
Compromising and collaborating are the strategies that should be used.
Explanation:
Collaboration can be understood as the procedure of two and more individuals entities, or organisations cooperating to complete a task or achieve an objective.
Cooperation and collaboration are two terms that are often used interchangeably. Most collaborations necessitate leadership, albeit it might take the character of social governance within a decentralized and democratic organisation.
To compromise would be to reach an agreement between two or more parties in which each party relinquishes a portion of its claim. Compromise is the idea of reaching an arrangement through negotiation in a disagreement.
Answer:
a. 1, 5 and 7
b. Resources will be allocated inefficiently
c. Differing sizes and capacities
d. Benefits due to economies of scale
e. Reduce prices and improve resource allocation.
Explanation:
The correct combination is 1, 5 and 7. The price of a pure monopoly firm is much higher than that of purely competitive firm because the later is a price taker while the former is a price fixer. Because of this, output of monopoly is lower while the profit margin is higher than that of competitive firm.
Assuming that a pure monopolist and a purely competitive firm have the same unit costs. In the case of a pure monopolist, resources will be allocated inefficiently because the monopolist does not produce at the point of minimum Average Total Cost and does not equate price and Marginal cost.
Even though both monopolists and competitive firms follow the MC = MR rule in maximizing profits, there are differences in the economic outcomes because pure competitors lack capacity and are smaller in size while the monopolist has the capacity to expand inorder to maximize profits.
The costs of a purely competitive firm and a monopoly may be different because the monopolist is capable of taking advantage of cost reduction arising from economics of scale. Pure competitors does not experience economies of scale due to their small sizes.
If a monopoly can experience economies of scale, it can reduce prices beyond that of the pure competitor thereby ensuring a more efficient resource allocation.
Credit cards i’m pretty sure
