The answer is true. if you need anymore help msg me
Answer:
The correct answers is option A:
A). As sales have increased, the number of safety regulations have increased.
Explanation:
The paragraph does not mention anything about profits, nor customer satisfaction. Additionally the paragraph provided says exactly the same thing as the answer option A.
I believe your question does not include the paragraph which it talk about, or else it feels way too easy.
Answer:
He views ethics as relative
Explanation:
Ethics is a word that was derived from "ethos" which is a Greek word, that means character or habit.
Therefore , ethics can simply be explained or described as a system of moral principles. This can be explained further as the moral principles that are governing persons behavior.
There are some principles of ethics, these include autonomy, justice, truth-telling, promise-keeping among others.
In this case, Alfred was viewing ethics as relative, because he was given his friend the first shot based on the idea that he needed the job seriously.
Answer:
The correct answer is: Individuals have a great deal of control when it comes to their day-to-day actions.
Explanation:
Free-will can be understood as the possibility of choosing between differente courses of action.
The concept of free-will has been studied for over centuries by psychology, philosophy, religion, the arts, and so on, at it states that individuals are able to decide which path to follow in life, decisions to make, etc.
The contrary to free-will is determinism which states that individuals only follow a previously written or stablished life-path.
In conclusion, the statement that a free-will defendant is most likely to believe is: Individuals have a great deal of control when it comes to their day-to-day actions.
Federal courts are courts of limited jurisdiction. They can only hear cases authorized by the United States and <span>cases in which the United </span>States<span> is a party, cases involving violations of the Constitution or federal law, crimes on federal land, and bankruptcy cases. The federal courts have NOT jurisdiction in situations about laws, treaties and Constitution of the United States.</span>