Using Wiener’s Attribution Theory focusing on achievement, a person’s failure can be perceived and interpreted to conclude its connection to the person’s positive habit. The relationship between the person’s failure and his positive habit can be analyzed by the three causal dimensions: locus of control, stability and controllability. Locus of control refers to the person’s perception of the cause of the failure, may it be internal (personal such as positive habit) or external (from the environment like luck). Stability determines if the cause of the failure is stable or unstable (example: ability versus positive habit). Controllability decides whether or not the individual can or can’t control the cause of the failure.
Question: <em>What is the opposite of 38.7?</em>
Answer: The opposite of a positive number is a negative number. This is a very simple equation to solve to figure out the negative, just cancel out the positive to get ₋38.7.
Uplifting Note: Everyone is an artist in some way, so what's your art?
Three intervention strategies that can be used to ensure youth participation in civic organizations would be:
- By educating them.
- By encouraging youths to run for offices
- By including youths and the designs and the implementation of strategies.
<h3>What is meant by youth participation?</h3>
This is the term that is used to refer to the fact that young people are able to participate in the situations that are in the government.
This would make it a more inclusive process for the youths. A way to do this would be by educating them on the programs.
Read more on youth participation here:
brainly.com/question/24434559
#SPJ1
One of the most important social psychological findings concerning race relations is that members of stereotyped groups internalize those stereotypes and thus suffer a wide range of harmful consequences.
Stereotype Threat is the experience of anxiety or concern in a situation where a person has the potential to confirm a negative stereotype about their social group. Since its introduction into the academic literature in 1995, Stereotype Threat has become one of the most widely studied topics in the field of social psychology. First described by social psychologist, Claude Steele and his colleagues, Stereotype Threat has been shown to reduce the performance of individuals who belong to negatively stereotyped groups. If negative stereotypes are present regarding a specific group, they are likely to become anxious about their performance, which in turn may hinder their ability to perform at their maximum level.
Stereotype Threat is a potential contributing factor to long-standing racial and gender gaps in academic performance. However, it may occur whenever an individual’s performance might confirm a negative stereotype. This is because Stereotype Threat is thought to arise from the particular situation rather than from an individual’s personality traits or characteristics. Since most people have at least one social identity which is negatively stereotyped, most people are vulnerable to Stereotype Threat if they encounter a situation in which the stereotype is relevant.
Situational factors that increase Stereotype Threat can include the difficulty of the task, the belief that the task measures their abilities, and the relevance of the negative stereotype to the task. Individuals show higher degrees of Stereotype Threat on tasks they wish to perform well on and when they identify strongly with the stereotyped group. These effects are also increased when they expect discrimination due to their identification with negatively stereotyped group. Repeated experiences of Stereotype Threat can lead to a vicious circle of diminished confidence, poor performance, and loss of interest in the relevant area of achievement.
The opposite of Stereotype Threat is known as Stereotype Enhancement, which entails an individual’s potential to confirm a positive stereotype about their social group, and a subsequent increase in performance ability in the related task as compared to their ability prior to their exposure to the stereotype.
Advocates of Stereotype Threat explanation have been criticized for exaggerating it and for misrepresenting evidence as more conclusive than it is.