Answer:
Colonial Governments Charters of royal colonies provided for direct rule by the king. A colonial legislature was elected by property holding males. But governors were appointed by the king and had almost complete authority — in theory. hope this helps :)
Answer:
<u>Positive effects</u> - Great Britain brought its political and industrialist points of view. In this way,<u>railroads were built, bridges and cities were modernized In a nutshell, India saw an increased development (especially in industrialization).</u> The same happens with the administration, <em><u>and the conflict between the local leaders became less common.</u></em>
<em><u></u></em>
<u>Negative effects -</u> <u>we can't forget that India was under control of an imperialist country, and because of that, indian villages were not self control, and everything was determined by the British government. </u>
Explanation:
Answer:
The Navigation Act was considered a ECONOMIC ACT.
Explanation:
The United Kingdom made this act to help itself become self-sufficient, and this made it so it relied less on imported goods, and rely on itself more. This act eventually led to the Anglo-Dutch War in 1652, and after that, it led to the Plantation Duty act of 1673, which was the main factor in causing Culpeper's Rebellion. Hope this helps!
The absolute monarchy which before had brought so many benefits to the development of commerce and the French bourgeoisie was now an obstacle. Mercantilism laws kept goods from being sold freely. Officers prevented the development of faster manufacturing processes. In short, absolute monarchy was an obstacle, preventing the modernization of France. This obstacle needed to be removed, and defenses of this political system were perceived negatively by the rest of the population seeking a revolution, and many times they were seen as personal and political enemies during a war. Which justifies the executing of French supporters of the Austrian and Prussian monarchies.
