Answer:
Machiavelli claims that a leader must find a balance between a temperate and a cruel attitude to be successful. He makes a very effective argument. First, he uses deductive reasoning by stating a conclusion that he uses to prove his point. He says that if a leader is not cruel, his subjects will rebel and no one will obey the law. Second, his evidence is compelling. Machiavelli uses historical examples to support his ideas, which are clear and interesting to read. Finally, he uses sophisticated diction, creating a serious tone that provides a sense of authority. His reasoning, evidence, and diction all work together to support his claim, making his argument both horrifying and effective.
Explanation:
A historian compares the events by period since he compares them by time period
It breached a long-standing line between domestic law enforcement and foreign military operations for the first time.
Answer:
hecks and Balances. ... With checks and balances, each of the three branches of government can limit the powers of the others. This way, no one branch is too powerful. Each branch “checks” the powers of the other branches to make sure that the power is balanced between them.
Explanation:
PLZ CHECK IT AGAIN IDONT THINK THE ANSWER IS APPOROPIATE IF THE ANSWER IS CORRECT PLZ MARK ME AS THE BRAILIEST
