Answer:
The correct answers are the following:
a - 4 Sunk
b - 5 Opportunity
c - 3 Fixed
d - 2 Variable
e - 6 Incremental
f - 1 Recurring
g - 7 Direct
h - 8 Non-recurring
Explanation:
a) <em>Sunk costs</em> are those that have already occurred in the past and they can not be recovered again so therefore that they are not relevant at the time of taking decisions regarding the futue.
b) <em>Opportunity costs</em> are those that try to measure and show the sacrifice done at the time of making a decision when that sacrifice represents the best second option that the person could have done.
c) <em>Fixed costs</em> are those that are always the same amount and do not change with the activity level of the production of the company.
d) <em>Variable costs</em> are those that do change with the amount of activity level that the company has during the production process.
e)<em> Incremental costs</em> are those that increase the cost level of the production while the output level increases as well, so they are a concept on the margin.
f) <em>Recurring costs</em> are those that tend to repete continously in the production process so the company already know how much the amount of the cost is.
g) <em>Direct costs</em> are those that the company associates with the production process regarding the commodities and all the primary sources that are needed to produce the good and therefore that they impact directly in the production and in the cost of the final product.
h) <em>Non-recurring</em> costs are those that the company are not familiar with due to the fact that they do not repete often and therefore tend to happen once in a while.
Answer:
Please check the answer below
Explanation:
a. One issue is the "locking-in" of assets. If I hold shares of Corporation X, then I can delay paying taxes as long as I don't sell. Effectively, I get to keep all of the interest/dividend payments on my tax liability. However, if I discover that X is really a poor investment and Corporation Y is better, then selling X and buying Y means that I have to pay taxes. This might discourage me from making a switch to a more profitable/efficient investment decision. This is the "locking-in" effect.
b. A short-run cut might cause many people to sell stocks that they had felt "locked-in" with. The penalty for switching is smaller, so more people will do it -- resulting in a great deal of cap gains tax revenue collected.
c. Taxing realized gains, even when the stock is not sold, rather than just accrued gains would eliminate this locking-in effect. Investors would not be penalized for switching to a better investment, and long-term capital gains revenue (as well as efficiency) would rise.
Answer:
The option that maximizes Maggie's taste index is 1 snack bar and 2 ice creams
Explanation:
<u>snack bar</u> <u>ice cream</u>
37 grams 65 grams
120 calories 160 calories
5 grams of fat 10 grams of fat
Maggie wants to consume up to 450 calories and 25 grams of fat, but she needs at least 120 grams of dessert per day. Ice cream taste 95, snack bars 85.
- maximize taste index = [85(37X) + 95(65Y)] / (37X + 65Y)
- 5X + 10Y ≤ 25 ⇒ CONSTRAINT 1
- 120X + 160Y ≤ 450 ⇒ CONSTRAINT 2
- 37X + 65Y ≥ 120 ⇒ CONSTRAINT 3
- X ≥ 0 ⇒ CONSTRAINT 4
- Y ≥ 0 ⇒ CONSTRAINT 5
maximum possible combinations following constraint 1, 4 AND 5:
- option 1: 1 snack bar - 2 ice creams (5 + 20 = 25)
- option 2: 2 snack bars - 1 ice cream (10 + 10 = 20)
- option 3: 3 snack bars - 1 ice cream (15 + 10 = 25)
possible combinations following constraint 2:
- option 1: 1 snack bar - 2 ice creams (120 + 320 = 440)
- option 2: 2 snack bars - 1 ice cream (240 + 160 = 400)
possible combination following constraint 3:
- option 1: 1 snack bar - 2 ice creams (37 + 130 = 167)
- option 2: 2 snack bars - 1 ice cream (74 + 65 = 139)
since we only have two possibilities, we can calculate which one generates the highest taste index
maximize taste index = [85(37X) + 95(65Y)] / (37X + 65Y)
- option 1: 1 snack bar - 2 ice creams = [85(37) + 95(130)] / (37 + 130) = (3,145 + 12,350) / 167 = 92.78
- option 2: 2 snack bars - 1 ice cream = [85(74) + 95(65)] / (74 + 65) = (6,290 + 6,175) / 139 = 89.68
Answer: $45,000
Explanation:
Given that,
Accounts receivable = $ 5,000
Sales revenue = $75,000
Cash = $15,000
Salaries and wages expense = $20,000
Rent expense = $10,000
Net income = Sales revenue - Salaries and wages expense - Rent expense
= $75,000 - $20,000 - $10,000
= $45,000
Answer:
8%
Explanation:
First calculate annual gross income. 900 x 6 x 12 = 64,800. Next determine the net income. 64,800 - 16,880 = 48,000. 48,000 / 600,000 = .08 or 8%