Answer:
a common resource when it is congested, but it is a public good when it is not congested.
Explanation:
We live in different areas, across city streets, with roads and they can either be public goods or common resources. Now, when the streets are not congested, it simply means that an individual can freely access the areas without that affecting any other person. In this simple case, the use by one person is not in rival consumption and so the streets are said to be a public good. But when the area is fully congested, people might find it difficult to move around through the areas. The use of the areas could cause negative externalities. Because the place would be overcrowded, people can only move at a slow pace. In this case, the street are said to be a common resource.
Answer:
The Silverside Company
Project 1's Payback Period
= Initial Investment/Annual cash flows
= $400,000 / $90,000
= 4.44 years.
Explanation:
Project 1:
Initial Investment = $400,000
Useful life = 5 years
Annual cash inflows for useful life = $90,000
The Silverside Company's payback period calculates the time or number of years that it would take the company to recover from its initial investment in Project 1. This is the simple payback period calculation. There is also the discounted payback period calculation. This method discounts the annual cash inflows to their present values before the calculation is carried out. This second method gives a present value perspective on the issue.
Answer:
C.) The law will have no impact on the market.
Explanation:
The minimum wage refers that the producers could charge high amount as compared with the wages i.e. minimum also the equilibrium wage would be more than the minimum wage so this represents that the market is an equilibrium point and hence there is no impact on the market
Therefore the option C is correct
And, hence all the other options are wrong
Answer:
Casey would prefer option 1; that he pays the premiums ($8,000). Even if Casey cannot deduct his insurance premiums as medical expenses, his income will only be reduced by $8,000. If he decided to take option 2, his income would be reduced by $8,800 (= $10,000 - 12%), so he is saving $800 by taking option 1.
On the other hand, Jean would prefer option 2; that her salary is reduced by $10,000 and her employer pays the premiums. By choosing option 2, Jean is going to lose $6,500 (= $10,000 - 35%). If she chose option 1, her income would be reduced by $8,000, so she is saving $1,500 by choosing option 2.
Answer:
Yes, agree, business transactions are economic transactions. Two reasons why:
- Profit motive: economic transactions have a profit motive: they are carried out and agreed upon between the two parties, because the parties feel that they will be better off after the transaction is completed. Business transactions are based on the profit motive.
- Things of value: goods and/or services, are exchanged between the parties. In business transactions, either a good (for example, an asset), or a service (for example, employees), is always exchanged.
