PLEASE HELP :’( last one

hammer [34]

Answer:

The test statistic is z=2.5.

The null hypothesis is rejected.

There is enough evidence to support the claim that more than 10% of the 16 ounce cups are underfilled.

Step-by-step explanation:

This is a hypothesis test for a proportion.

The claim is that more than 10% of the 16 ounce cups are underfilled.

Then, the null and alternative hypothesis are:

$H_0: \pi=0.1\\\\H_a:\pi>0.1$

The significance level is assumed to be 0.05.

The sample has a size n=100.

The sample proportion is p=0.18.

$p=X/n=18/100=0.18$

The standard error of the proportion is:

$\sigma_p=\sqrt{\dfrac{\pi(1-\pi)}{n}}=\sqrt{\dfrac{0.1*0.9}{100}}\\\\\\ \sigma_p=\sqrt{0.001}=0.03$

Then, we can calculate the z-statistic as:

$z=\dfrac{p-\pi-0.5/n}{\sigma_p}=\dfrac{0.18-0.1-0.5/100}{0.03}=\dfrac{0.075}{0.03}=2.5$

This test is a right-tailed test, so the P-value for this test is calculated as:

$P-value=P(z>2.5)=0.006$

As the P-value (0.006) is smaller than the significance level (0.05), the effect is significant.

The null hypothesis is rejected.

There is enough evidence to support the claim that more than 10% of the 16 ounce cups are underfilled.

7 0

3 years ago

What is a solid figure with two congruent parallel polygonal bases?

nika2105 [10]

A solid figure that has two congruent, parallel polygons as its bases would be a prism, and its sides are parallelograms.

3 0

3 years ago

If total advertising expenditures on television advertising declined 4.1% to $141.7 billion in the current year, how much was sp

Vanyuwa [196]

Using proportions, it is found that $147.8 billion was spent on television advertising in the previous year.

$x, in billions, was spent on advertising expenditures on television last year.

This year, the amount declined 4.1%, hence it is 100% - 4.1% = 95.9% of last year's amount, that is, 0.959x.

This year spending's is of 141.7 billion, hence, the equation is:

$0.959x = 141.7$

$x = \frac{141.7}{0.959}$

$x = 147.8$

$147.8 billion was spent on television advertising in the previous year.

To learn more about proportions, you can take a look at brainly.com/question/24372153

4 0

2 years ago

Which is the value of this expression when p=-2 and q=-1?

saul85 [17]

Answer:

D. 4

Step-by-step explanation:

$[(p^2) (q^{-3}) ]^{-2}.[(p)^{-3}(q)^5] ^{-2}\\\\=[(p^2) (q^{-3}) \times(p)^{-3}(q)^5 ]^{-2}\\\\=[(p^{2}) \times(p)^{-3} \times (q^{-3}) \times(q)^5 ]^{-2}\\\\=[(p^{2-3}) \times (q^{5-3}) ]^{-2}\\\\=[(p^{-1}) \times (q^{2}) ]^{-2}\\\\=(p^{-1\times (-2)}) \times (q^{2\times (-2) }) \\\\=p^{2}\times q^{-4} \\\\= \frac{p^2}{q^4}\\\\= \frac{(-2)^2}{(-1)^4}\\\\= \frac{4}{1}\\\\= 4$

8 0

2 years ago

I'm confused about how to find x.

NikAS [45]

Hi! so you would find x by adding the corners up to 180 degrees.

steps:
Add the corners
90+(2x+1)+(5x+5)
7x+96=180
then subtract 96 from 180
you’d get 7x = 84
then divide 7 on both sides and get x=12

7 0

3 years ago