Answer:
false
Step-by-step explanation:
the are the same jus5 one has more zero afterwards
Answer:
- perimter of original rectangle = <u>17. 6 mm</u>
- side length of the enlarged rectangle = <u>23. 22 mm</u>
- perimeter of the enlarged rectangle = <u>95. 04 mm</u>
Step-by-step explanation:
<u>PERIMETER</u><u> </u><u>OF</u><u> </u><u>ORIGINAL</u><u> </u><u>RECTANGLE</u>
- Length of original rectangle = 4.5 mm
- Width of original rectangle = 4.3 mm
<em>perimeter = 2 × ( length + width)</em>
= 2 × ( 4.5 + 4.3)
= 2 × 8.8
= 17. 6 mm
<u>SIDE</u><u> </u><u>LENGTH</u><u> </u><u>OF</u><u> </u><u>ENLARGED</u><u> </u><u>RECTANGLE</u>
- Width of original rectangle = 4. 5 mm
- Width of enlarged rectangle = 24.3 mm
Enlargement factor = 24.3 / 4.5
= 5.4
- Length of original rectangle = 4.5 mm
- Enlargement factor = 5.4
Side length of enlarged rectangle
= original length × Enlargement factor
= 4.3 × 5.4
= 23. 22 mm
<u>PERIMTER OF ENLARGED RECTANGLE</u>
= 2 × ( enlarged ength + enlarged breadth)
= 2 × (23. 22 + 24. 3 )
= 95. 04 mm
<span>Quincy
says that 3 is a good estimate for 3.4 X 0.09, is she correct? Why?
When we say estimates meaning it is not the exact answer but close to what is
the exact.
Now, if Quincy estimated 3 as the product of 3.4 * .09, then let’s check if she
has the correct estimates.
=> 3.4 estimates is 3
=> 0.09 estimates is 0.1
Now the answer is 0.3 and not 3.
Thus, Quincy’s estimate is wrong.</span>
