Answer: <em>Option (C) is correct.</em>
Explanation:
<em>A recurrent conclusion of injuries occurred while falling is a long-term pain, medication for these are not taken in consideration among intermediate per-person costs of emergency cure for aged or old individuals's laceration from such falls</em>, if true, will have the tendency to seriously undermines conclusion of argument given in the comprehension.
This states that argument given in the comprehension has not taken in consideration cost for medicine which overall will increase cost. Thereby with an increase in cost the given statement will become untrue since the cost of surgery and medicine combined is higher than cost, in such a case treatment would be more economical. Therefore it undermines conclusion of argument.
Answer:
$17,000
Explanation:
Leker's Old Property Adjusted Tax Basis = $20,000
To calculate the new basis, subtract the $3000 recieved in cash from the new property.
New Tax Basis; $20,000-$3,000= $17,000
The transaction of Leker to exchange a real property for another led to a loss: Meaning a Property of $20,000 was exchanged for a property of $10,000+ $3,000 (cash)= $13,000
The Loss on the transaction= $20,000- $13,000= $7,000
Due to the loss no gain is recognized and the $3000 will reduce the basis for his new asset.
They dont see the end benefit
Not 100% on this one
Answer:
a)
$34.4
b)
$37.20
c) $59.57
Explanation:
Given:
Dividend paid = $2.15
Growth rate = 4% = 0.04
Required return = 10.5% = 0.105
Now,
a) Present value = 
for the current price n = 1
thus,
Current price = 
= 
= $34.4
b) Price in 3 years
i.e n = 3
=
= 
=
$37.20
c) Price in 15 years
i.e n = 15
=
= 
= $59.57
