The main reason why the Japanese liberalized the bank mergers in Japan was to protect the economy and prevent an economic crash.
<h3>What is Financial Liberalization?</h3>
This refers to the removal of regulatory control in the financial sector to promote economic growth.
The government of Japan faced an economic crash that threatened to cripple the economy due to stock market crash, failing banks, etc and there was the use of risk-based capital to try and prevent this, amongst other solutions.
Hence, we can see that the key aspects of the liberalization program were:
The key criticism of the program is that it failed to address the scale of the problem and the solution was only short-term.
Read more about financial liberalization here:
brainly.com/question/26948358
#SPJ1
If a certain country considered handshakes in business transactions to be taboo and preferred to use nodding, This would be an example of differences in cultural forces. It is an example of differences in cultural customs because it includes <span>customs, lifestyles and values that characterize a society that are different. </span>
The share price falls when a dividend is paid because the reduction in cash decreases the market value of assets.
After a stock price goes ex-dividend, the share price in the market typically decreases by the amount of the dividend paid in order to reflect the fact that new shareholders there are not entitled to that payment.
In the market, when the dividends are paid out as stock instead of cash, then this can dilute earnings, which can also have a negative impact on share prices in the short term.
Hence, there is still no direct connection between a company's dividend and its stock price.
To learn more about dividends here:
brainly.com/question/2960815
#SPJ4
Answer:
Task 1:
The answer is $700.
Task 2:
The answer is $130.
Task 3:
The answer is $20.
Task 4:
The answer is $10,570.
Task 5:
The answer is $110.
Explanation:
<h2>Task 1:</h2><h3>How much does each investor make on his investment with the 7% rate of return?</h3><h3>Solution:</h3>
Adrian & Clemens makes [$10,000*0.07] on their investment = $700.
<h2>Task 2:</h2><h3>How much does Adrian pay in fees for his actively managed mutual fund?</h3><h3>Solution:</h3>
Adrian owes to his broker = (10000*.013) = $130
<h2>Task 3:</h2><h3>How much does Clemens pay in fees for the index fund?</h3><h3>Solution:</h3>
Clemens owes to his broker= ($10000*.002) = $20
<h2>Task 4:</h2><h3>At the end of the year, what's the total value (AFTER FEES) of Adrian's mutual fund?</h3><h3>Solution:</h3>
Value of Adrian's stock = $10000+$570 (net of brokerage) = $10,570
<h2>Task 5:</h2><h3>What's the total value (AFTER FEES) of Clemens's index fund?</h3><h3>Solution:</h3>
Value of clemens' stock = $10000+$680 (net of brokerage) = $10,680
<h2>Task 6:</h2><h3>How much more value does Clemens' investment generate than Adrian's in one year's time?</h3><h3>Solution:</h3>
Clemens investment makes ($680-$570) than adrian's investment = $110
Under Price discrimination, an organization compares a few dimensions of its performance to that of another company, be it a competitor or in a totally distinctive industry.
Charge discrimination is a promoting method that fees clients one-of-a-kind charges for the same products or services based on what the seller thinks they can get the patron to comply with. In natural price discrimination, the vendor fees every customer the most fee they'll pay.
Charge discrimination refers to charging distinct clients special costs for the same true carrier. The Sherman Antitrust Act, Clayton Antitrust Act, and Robinson-Patman Act outlaw price discrimination while the intent of that discrimination is to harm competitors.
Price discrimination in a monopoly is a practice of charging extraordinary costs for an equal product. Monopolies generally have extra control over providers than ordinary sellers, which means that they can notably impact the providers' promoting prices.
Learn more about Price discrimination here: brainly.com/question/23342760
#SPJ4
