You "distributed" the negation inside the parenthesis. Let's focus on the
part.
We can distribute the negation inside the parenthesis by negating every term, and switching and with or, and vice versa. So, you have

Of course, writing
is improper, I was just stressing the fact that we distributed the negation to every term in the parenthesis. So, since a double negation cancels out, you're left with

which of course implies that

Edit: I actually derived the expression in the opposite order, but since they are equivalent, it doesn't really matters where you start from and where you get to. Anyway, if you actually want to derive
from
, you simply have to negate the first parenthesis and distribute the negation as discussed.
Answer:
x=1.-7
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
23, 24 and 25
Step-by-step explanation:
These are consecutive numbers that add up to 72.
Answer:
D
Step-by-step explanation:
the ratio of rows to flowers is 1:4, so for every 1 row, there are 4 flowers. so the equation would be f = 4r. do you understand how I got to that?
Answer:
the rate compounded semi-annually is compounded twice in a year. thus, this rate is higher than the rate compounded annually which is compounded once in a year
Step-by-step explanation:
The formula for calculating future value:
FV = P (1 + r/m)^mn
FV = Future value
P = Present value
R = interest rate
N = number of years
m = number of compounding
For example, there are two banks
Bank A offers 10% rate with semi-annual compounding
Bank B offers 10% rate with annual compounding.
If you deposit $100, the amount you would have after 2 years in each bank is
A = 100x (1 + 0.1/2)^4 = 121.55
B = 100 x (1 + 0.1)^2 = 121
The interest in bank a is 0.55 higher than that in bank B