Lo siento mucho, necesito los puntos porque estoy en una prueba.
Answer:
x=8
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer: 81°
Explanation:
1) Law of cosines:
In a triangle with sides a, b, c whose opposite angles are, respectively, A, B and C, the law of cosines states:
b² = a² + c² - 2 (a)(c) cos (B)
2) In the triangle of the figure you have
b = 4.0
B = ?
a = 2.2
c = 3.7
⇒ (4.0)² = (2.2)² + (3.7)² - 2 (2.2) (3.7) cos(B)
⇒ 16 = 4.84 + 13.69 - 16.28cos(B)
⇒ 16.28 cos(B) = 4.84 + 13.69 - 16 = 2.53
⇒ cos(B) = 2.53 / 16.28
⇒ X = arccos(2.53 / 16.28 ) = 81.06° ≈ 81°
At 13% significance level, there isn't enough evidence to prove the administrators to claim that the mean score for the state's eighth graders on this exam is more than 280.
<h3>How to state hypothesis conclusion?</h3>
We are given;
Sample size; n = 78
population standard deviation σ = 37
Sample Mean; x' = 280
Population mean; μ = 287
The school administrator declares that mean score is more (bigger than) 280. Thus, the hypotheses is stated as;
Null hypothesis; H₀: μ > 280
Alternative hypothesis; Hₐ: μ < 280
This is a one tail test with significance level of α = 0.13
From online tables, the critical value at α = 0.13 is z(c) = -1.13
b) Formula for the test statistic is;
z = (x- μ)/(σ/√n)
z = ((280 - 287) *√78 )/37
z = -1.67
c) From online p-value from z-score calculator, we have;
P[ z > 280 ] = 0.048
d) The value for z = -1.67 is smaller than the critical value mentioned in problem statement z(c) = - 1.13 , the z(s) is in the rejection zone. Therefore we reject H₀
e) We conclude that at 13% significance level, there isn't enough evidence to prove the administrators to claim that the mean score for the state's eighth graders on this exam is more than 280.
Read more about Hypothesis Conclusion at; brainly.com/question/15980493
#SPJ1
(3,8)
-5 is 4 units right, so do the opposite, 4 units left. 2 is 3 units down so do 3 units up
