1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Paul [167]
3 years ago
9

How does the French and Indian war relate to today

Social Studies
1 answer:
KatRina [158]3 years ago
6 0

<u>The French and Indian war:</u>

The French and Indian War (1754–1763) is the name for the North American venue of the Seven Years' War. The war was battled basically between the settlements of Great Britain and New France, with the two sides bolstered by powers from Europe just as American Indian partners.

The two sides needed the valley so they could grow their settlements into the zone. The Seven Years' War finished with the marking of the settlements of Hubertusburg and Paris in February 1763. The British triumph in the French and Indian War greatly affected the British Empire.

Right off the battle, it implied an incredible development of British regional cases in the New World. Firstly, the expense of the war had extraordinarily amplified Britain's obligation.

In the Treaty of Paris, France lost all cases to Canada and offered Louisiana to Spain, while Britain got Spanish Florida, Upper Canada, and different French possessions abroad.

You might be interested in
Global stratification may sometimes simply be divided into two groups, based on how wealth is distributed among their population
liq [111]

The answer is: Social class

Social class is generally divided based on how much resources that those people have to influence a change in the society where they lived in.

In almost all modern societies, social class will clearly distinguished by the wealth/money that people possessed. So the society is divided into two, the poor and the rich.

People who had vast amount of wealth, could have larger influence in changing the society because they can funded their activism group or influence the legislation by giving funding to the government representative of their choosing.

3 0
3 years ago
Global plagiarism is plagiarism that occurs when one pieces together bits from one or more sources and represents the end result
Allushta [10]

The given statement is not true.

Global Plagiarism is a Plagiarism that occurs when one pieces together bits from one or more sources and represents the end result as his or her own. This statement is False.

Explanation:

When a person uses the entire or whole work done by someone else and presents it as his own work, this is called as Global Plagiarism. Global Plagiarism is the most obvious and common form of Plagiarism. In simple words, we say that when a person copies and pastes the material produced by someone else as it is, this is the Global Plagiarism.

When a person patches together bits of work from one or more sources and represents the end result as his or her own, that is Patchwork Plagiarism.

Learn more about Global Plagiarism at:

brainly.com/question/13736447

#LearnWithBrainly

3 0
3 years ago
As a result of federal laws and the 14th amendment to the us constitution the federal courts blank
xxMikexx [17]

Answer:

The federal courts were empowered to intervene.

Explanation:

As a result of the 14th Amendment, the federal courts gained the power to intervene in the area to impose equal protection of the laws. The courts were also allowed to import certain rights which promoted freedom of speech, freedom of religion, protection from unreasonable and unfair treatment and punishment. It promoted equal protection for the well-being of citizens and encouraged harmony to make the area peaceful.

8 0
3 years ago
4. Which of the following is a court decision that serves as a model for future court decisions?
vovangra [49]
I think it’s letter B but i’m so sorry if it’s wrong
4 0
2 years ago
How might assimilation be considered less harsh than paternalism?
Novosadov [1.4K]

The answer is that assimilation is considered to be less harsh than paternalism due to the fact that assimilation still enables a country to adopt various cultures, and makes equality, while in paternalism, it is considered to make a country lesser, or less a country. Paternalism refers to the practice or policy of government bodies that restricts freedom and responsibilities of those subordinate to them in the subordinates.

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • After she noticed that girls in her sorority wear their sorority pins every day, Mia began wearing her pin daily.
    9·1 answer
  • Which of the four major Trails was the shortest?how long was it?
    6·1 answer
  • How did Muslims under the "rightly guided" caliphs treat conquered people?
    6·1 answer
  • Daniel is trying to write a good scientific question. Daniel writes, "Why are young cacti often found growing under larger trees
    8·1 answer
  • Federal territories such as Puerto Rico, Guam, and the Virgin Islands ___.
    8·2 answers
  • Indeterminists and soft determinists (compatibilists) both believe that freewill is consistent with causal determinism.
    12·2 answers
  • Amy, an American college student, is studying abroad in France. She immediately notices a range of cultural differences such as
    6·1 answer
  • Name two Illinois cities that are on the shore of Lake Michigan​
    10·1 answer
  • Derrick is an active member of Humane Farm Animal Care and abhors killing of animals for food. He does not want to be part of me
    15·1 answer
  • Help do in 5 min
    11·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!