Answer:
The answer to this question: In McCulloch v. Maryland, the Supreme Court invoked which provisions of the Constitution, would be: the necessary and proper clause and the supremacy clause.
Explanation:
The McCulloch vs. Maryland case, as a response to the financial crisis of 1819, established two landmarks, when the Supreme Court ruled first, that the state of Maryland did not have the power to tax the National Bank, as it was a federal institution, and therefore, the state did not have the power to interfere in a federal institution, especially when it came to taxing, and second, that the power of the federal government and its institutions superseded those of states. In this instance two provisions were invoked from the Constitution: The Necessary and Proper Clause and the Supremacy Clause, which curtail the rights of states to impose taxes on federal institutions, and also, that establish that the federal government reigns supreme over states.
Negative behavior that is willfully ignored is extinction. The nurse, as the leader, should refuse to encourage bad conduct, in accordance with the OB Mod theory.
A leadership theory is a means of explaining nursing-related phenomena. They aid with the organization and interpretation of complex ideas as well as the provision of possible solutions for typical issues. The majority of leadership theories use historical figures and events as learning tools so that students may comprehend what made those decisions successful or instructive.
According to OB Mod theory, intervention is necessary to promote desired performance behavior and suppress undesirable behavior. This method was created by Kreitner and Fred Luthans. The effectiveness of the organization can be increased and employee motivation can be achieved through organizational behavior modification.
To know more about OB Mod theory refer:
brainly.com/question/13221322
#SPJ4
Answer:
The United States eased tensions with China and the Soviet Union.
Explanation:
The biggest difference between options and futures exists that futures contracts need that the transaction specified by the contract must take place on the date specified. Options, on the other hand, provide the buyer of the contract the right — but not the obligation — to execute the transaction.
<h3>What is the difference between futures contract and options?</h3>
A futures contract is put into effect on the specified date. The buyer buys the underlying asset on this date. In the meantime, the buyer of an options contract is free to execute the agreement at any point before the expiration date.
You may therefore purchase the asset anytime you believe the circumstances are favorable. A futures contract gives the holder the option to purchase or sell a certain item at a predetermined price on a predetermined future date. Options allow the option to purchase or sell a certain asset at a specific price on a specific date, but not the obligation to do so.
Hence, The biggest difference between options and futures exists that futures contracts need that the transaction specified by the contract must take place on the date specified. Options, on the other hand, provide the buyer of the contract the right — but not the obligation — to execute the transaction.
To learn more about futures contract refer to:
brainly.com/question/1193397
#SPJ4
Answer:
During the 2010 election there were members from different group of young clique and minorities partaking during the election year. Also,these groups were up in voter turn out, it happened that there was a majority democratic senate and a majority democratic house. These same groups were still up and the president was elected. Former president Barack Obama was the democratic candidate.
Explanation:
