Mississippi Supreme Court Decision: Brown v Stone. Stone, a 1979 state Supreme Court case in which the Court lead that a religious immunity in Mississippi statute was unlawful.
LIFO stands for Last in First out, essentially stating that the most recent products produced or purchased are the first to be sold or expensed. So lets list the quantity, dates, and prices in an ordered fashion.
June 1: 150 units $825
June 10: 200 units $1,120
June 15: 200 units $1,140
June 28: 150 units $885
Total: $3,970
What we know from the question is that only 200 units arrived. This plus the fact that we know we must use the LIFO method means that only the first 200 units arrived. So we get rid of every other unit cost in order to find ending inventory. So, lets find what's left.
150 units from June 1st: $825
50 units from June 10th: $1,120 / 200 = $5.6 per unit * 50 units = $280
$825 + $280 = $1,105
This means that the answer is going to be A - $1,105.
I hope I've helped! :)
Answer:
Realigning elections is a term from political science and political history that describes a dramatic change in the political system. Scholars frequently apply the term to American elections and occasionally to other countries. retrospective voting.
Explanation:
hope it helps
The correct option is (c); Yes, because the court took all well-pleaded facts in the complaint as true and resolved all doubts and inferences in the defendant's favor.
<h3>What is third-part defendant?</h3>
A third-party defendant is a person or entity that the primary defendant sues and adds to the case under the theory that they are accountable to the defendant for all or part of the plaintiff's claim.
For the given case:
- The court must accept as true all of the well-pleaded facts in the complaint and resolve any questions and inferences in the complainant's favor before deciding whether to grant a motion to dismiss for failure to establish a claim on which relief can be granted. The complainant in this case is the defendant.
- Answer option A is erroneous because the third-party defendant's move was a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim on which relief can be given, not a petition to dismiss for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. Furthermore, not withstanding the lack of diversity of citizenship, the court has subject-matter jurisdiction over the defendant's contribution complaint since it is based on federal law, even though it may raise the question of lack of subject-matter jurisdiction on its own.
- B is the incorrect response option. The court may only take into account the claims in the complaint, any exhibits attached to the complaint, and any matters susceptible to judicial notice when deciding whether to grant a motion to dismiss for failure to establish a claim on which relief can be granted. (Remember that for a request for summary judgment, the court could take into account outside information like an affidavit.)
- Because any party against whom a claim is made may file a motion to dismiss for failure to articulate a claim upon which relief can be given, answer choice D is wrong.
To know more about jurisdiction and its types, here
brainly.com/question/10377896
#SPJ4
