What was the brown v stone court case about?

Law

2 answers:

Makovka662 [10]2 years ago

5 0

Answer:

Explanation:

It was about the right of a parent to with hold immunization from a child for religious reasons. The immunizations would have protected the child from diseases described by health officials (I think in the state of MIssissippi).

The religious right appeal goes right back to the First Amendment which guarantees religious freedom. The court found that when a child endangers himself or others by not being protected from deadly diseases, the First Amendment's protection does not apply.

-Dominant- [34]2 years ago

3 0

Mississippi Supreme Court Decision: Brown v Stone. Stone, a 1979 state Supreme Court case in which the Court lead that a religious immunity in Mississippi statute was unlawful.

You might be interested in

Which act could be considered an acceptance of the social contract?

pentagon [3]

The answer would be - Viewing commercials in exchange for watching network news broadcasts

7 0

2 years ago

According to Phyllis Schlafly, the danger the Equal Rights Amendment poses to the fabric of America is that a. African-American

labwork [276]

Answer:

a. African-American women from poor backgrounds will be considered equal to highly educated and accomplished white women.

Explanation:

Phyllis Schlafly, a conservative activist, known for her opposition to feminism and her pivotal role in the defeat of the Equal Rights Amendment in the 1970s.

She believed that women's pursuit of social equality would hurt women living in sensitive situations. She believed it was unfair to equate young, wealthy, successful, white, healthy and educated women with poor, black, uneducated, old and sick women. She said that feminism did not think of women in delicate situations, who could not face the world and say that they have the same rights and duties as all of society.

6 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

What would the most difficult part of being a peace officer would be?

Vladimir [108]

Cops usually face the public with controlled emotions and can find it difficult to grieve openly or watch fellow officers grieve. Some struggle with symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder, along with a mix of anger .

3 0

1 year ago

Why do I have to sign up to this if I still need to watch ads

Shkiper50 [21]

they just want moneyy

3 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Two key questions should be asked when analyzing the problem dimension. Which of the following are the correct questions?

sineoko [7]

Answer:

For this problem we just refer to the descriptions that you placed under the prompt. According to Malcolm's bandmate, it would be easier to solve the trinomial by subtracting 350 from both sides and then factoring the equation. Malcolm, on the other hand, thinks that we should manipulate the equation in order to make it a perfect square trinomial.

2. This trinomial would be easily solved by using Malcolm's idea. As Malcolm pointed out, you just need to apply a formula to manipulate the equation then you can find the roots in no time. Finding the factors of 350 just to solve the trinomial would be the hard way to go since you would be considering a lot of them.

3. For this item, we are just tasked to follow what Malcolm's bandmate started doing. So, we would just need to think of two numbers that would result to -350 when multiplied. To start off, let's think of something we can divide 350 by, let's say 70. Now, if we divide -350 by 70 the result would be -5 therefore that would be our two numbers (p and q). p + q would therefore just be 65.

Explanation:

add up and keep doing it

4 0

2 years ago