All categories

3 years ago

What was the brown v stone court case about?

Law

2 answers:

Makovka662 [10]3 years ago

5 0

Answer:

Explanation:

It was about the right of a parent to with hold immunization from a child for religious reasons. The immunizations would have protected the child from diseases described by health officials (I think in the state of MIssissippi).

The religious right appeal goes right back to the First Amendment which guarantees religious freedom. The court found that when a child endangers himself or others by not being protected from deadly diseases, the First Amendment's protection does not apply.

-Dominant- [34]3 years ago

3 0

Mississippi Supreme Court Decision: Brown v Stone. Stone, a 1979 state Supreme Court case in which the Court lead that a religious immunity in Mississippi statute was unlawful.

You might be interested in

The law of mass action states that _____. Select all the options that complete the sentence correctly.

notka56 [123]

Answer: a chemical system reaches a state where the concentrations of reactants and products is a constant ratioequilibrium can be reached from any direction, i.e., by beginning with a mixture of reactants or products, or both

Explanation:

8 0

2 years ago

In the case of ________, the Supreme Court gave the lower courts some discretion over how they applied the test for qualified im

asambeis [7]

Answer:

Pearson v. Callahan

Explanation:

This was a case that was decided by the United States which would deal with the doctrine of qualified immunity.

Hope this Helps!

3 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

A attorney first address the jury during

lesya [120]

An attorney would first address the jury during the opening statements. Hope this helps

8 0

3 years ago

I'm If crime is a routine activity , what steps should you take to avoid becoming a crime victim ?

zaharov [31]

Answer:

Keep personal information private.

Protect passwords, PINs, and usernames.

Keep your eyes on your billing statements.

Order your credit report.

Invest in a shredder.

Don’t answer the door for strangers and keep your doors and windows locked.

Let people know if you are going out of town.

If you have a durable power of attorney, know the ins and outs.

If it’s too good to be true, it is.

Know your vulnerabilities.

6 0

3 years ago

Eleanor is a prosecuting attorney. She has prepared a strong case against the defendant, Arthur, who has been accused of arson.

Margarita [4]

Answer:

Motion for the extension of time for release of evidence

Explanation:

This is a pretrial application made by the prosecuting attorney on behalf of the claimant seeking for an extension of time for the release of evidence by the prime witnesses in order to prove the guilt of the accused person in the commission of the offence of arson.

In otherwords, Eleanor as the prosecuting attorney who has a strong case against the defendant needs time to prove to the court that the defendant is guilty of the offence of arson through the evidence of the prime eye-witnesses who were present at the scene where the offence was committed.

3 0

3 years ago