<u>Calculation of Return on Equity:</u>
Return on Equity can be calculated using the following formula:
Return on Equity = Net Income / Equity
We can calculate net income using the following formula:
Net Income = Sales * Profit Margin = 3650*5% = $182.50
And we can calculate Equity using the following formula:
Equity = Total Assets * (1-Total Debt ratio) = 3350*(1-41%) = $1976.50
Now Finally,
Return on Equity = Net Income / Equity = 182.50 / 1976.50 = 9.23%
Hence the return on equity is <u>9.23%</u>
There are a lot of ways to deal with an indecisive co-worker.
But for me here are some important tips that might be very helpful to make them not to be indecisive.
First - boost their confidence, let them do the talking sometimes
Second - Not to be available most of the time, make them do the last say.
Third - Appreciate them in every little achievements they make.
Answer:
Activity based costing says that we must not absorb the Overhead cost on the basis of one absorption basis as this overhead is not generated as a result of this absorption basis(Machine hrs or labor hours). This use of one absorption basis is inappropriate (not fair allocation). We must find a fair basis that drives this cost. Upon investigation the management found that the total overhead cost suppose which is $1,050,000 can be divided into three cost pools (parts) and each part has a cost driver(a basis of allocation) which can be used to allocate this cost.The costs in the ABC system are allocated to unit product on more fair basis than the tradition absorption costing which only assume one fair basis for allocation of overhead costs. ABC criticizes traditional costing technique for using only one basis for absorption of Overheads.
Now following example will help you in understanding the difference between Absorptiion Costing and Activity based costing.
Suppose both Mr. A and Mr. B drank 5 glasses of juices. Each glass of juice costs $4. According to the Traditional absorption costing technique each individual must pay:
(5 Juices/2)*$4=$10
But ABC says its unfair, use a more appropriate basis for cost allocation. So upon investigating we came to know that Mr. A drank 3 glasses of juice and Mr. B drank 2 glasses of juice. So Mr. A must pay $12(3*$4) and Mr. B must pay $8(2*$4). This is more appropriate or fair basis of absorbing the overhead cost to each individual and is Activity Based Costing.
Answer:
It can help in many ways one way being they can hold or help hold events in the community.
Explanation:
Answer:
-$30,250 favorable
Explanation:
labor efficiency variance = (standard quantity - actual quantity) x standard labor cost
- actual quantity = 7,700 hours
- standard quantity = 9.9 hours x 1,000 units = 9,900
- standard labor cost = $13.70
labor efficiency variance = (7,700 - 9,900) x $13.70 = -$30,250 favorable variance
the variance is favorable, because less hours were actually used than forecasted
