All categories

3 years ago

Plz plz plz help me out!!

Mathematics

1 answer:

slava [35]3 years ago

6 0

Henry swims at 1.6 laps per minute, Larry swims at 1.8 laps per minute. Larry swims faster

You might be interested in

0.16666666666 as a fraction

Ira Lisetskai [31]

The correct answer is 16666666666/100000000000.

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Help please I’m stuck

Jlenok [28]

12:4=3
9:3=3
so u multiply each side by 3 to get the second triangle..
answer: 4.5*3 =13.5

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

A farmer has a field in the shape of a triangle. The farmer has asked the manufacturing class at your school to build a metal fe

Finger [1]

Answer:

Fencing required = 1586 m

Step-by-step explanation:

The given statements can be thought of a triangle $\triangle ABC$ as shown in the diagram attached.

A be the 1st vertex, B be the 2nd vertex and C be the 3rd vertex.

Distance between 1st and 2nd vertex, AB = 435 m

Distance between 2nd and 3rd vertex, AC = 656 m

$\angle A =49^\circ$

To find:

Fencing required for the triangular field.

Solution:

Here, we know two sides of a triangle and the angle between them.

To find the fencing or perimeter of the triangle, we need the third side.

Let us use Cosine Rule to find the third side.

Formula for cosine rule:

$cos A = \dfrac{b^{2}+c^{2}-a^{2}}{2bc}$

Where

a is the side opposite to $\angle A$

b is the side opposite to $\angle B$

c is the side opposite to $\angle C$

$\Rightarrow cos 49^\circ = \dfrac{656^{2}+435^{2}-BC^{2}}{2\times 435\times 656}\\\Rightarrow BC^2 = 430336+189225-2 (435)(656)cos49^\circ\\\Rightarrow BC^2 = 430336+189225-570720\times cos49^\circ\\\Rightarrow BC^2 =619561-570720\times cos49^\circ\\\Rightarrow BC \approx 495\ m$

Perimeter of the triangle = Sum of three sides = AB + BC + AC

Perimeter of the triangle = 435 + 495 + 656 = 1586 m

Fencing required = 1586 m

4 0

3 years ago

The average cost per person of attending an online class depends on the number of people attending. If 20 people attend, the web

kondaur [170]

Answer:

The last table given See attached image)

Step-by-step explanation:

Notice that they are asking for the inverse function to the one with the detailed relationship given. The original relationship was assigning to the Domain of number of people attending, the Range of values for charges.

Therefore, the inverse function will be assigning in the opposite way: from the average charges (now the Domain of this relationship), to the number of people attending (now the Range of this relationship). The relationship should also maintain the original element to element connection:

What was:

(20, $10) should now be ($10, 20)

(26, $6.25) should now be ($6.25, 26)

(35, $4) should now be ($4, 35)

This is exactly represented by the last table (see also image attached)