True-No conflict will exist between the NPV and IRR methods, when used to evaluate two equally risky but mutually exclusive projects, if the projects' cost of capital exceeds the rate at which the projects' NPV profiles cross.
<h3>
What is NPV and IRR methods?</h3>
While the IRR approach calculates the projected percentage return, the NPV method produces the predicted dollar worth of a project.
Purpose. The breakeven cash flow level of a project is the emphasis of the IRR approach while project surpluses are the subject of the NPV method.
assistance with decisions. Since it provides a dollar return, the NPV approach delivers an outcome that serves as the basis for an investment decision. The IRR approach is not helpful in making this choice because its percentage return does not indicate to the investor how much money will be produced.
Reinvestment rate. When NPV is utilized, the firm's cost of capital is the assumed rate of return for reinvesting intermediate cash flows; when it is the internal rate of return.
To learn more about NPV and IRR methods from the given link:
brainly.com/question/21241533
#SPJ4
<h3>Hello there!</h3><h3>Answer: Receive the $189,000 today. It has a net value that's higher</h3>
The reason why you should receive the $189,000 today because it would have a net value that's higher than the second value.
When you get the $189,000, all of that money belongs to you, you don't have to worry about the discount rate of the property. The person that buys the property would be affected by the discount rate.
But for the second offer, you would apply the discount rate.
In the second offer, you're suppose to be getting $200,000. However, the discount rate will take away some of the money.

You would technically only get $182,000, meaning that you would be getting less than what you expected.
<h3>I hope this helps!</h3><h3>Best regards,</h3><h3>MasterInvestor</h3>
<span>Answer 70 minutes.
Explanation:
Total school working hours 8AM to 3:30 Pm is 420 minutes excluding the 30 min Lunch break.
Class hours = 7 periods of 50 minutes each = 350 minutes
so 420-350 =70 minutes time is spent in getting from one class or lunch period to another.</span>
Answer:
The only dominant strategy in this game is for <u>Crystal</u> to choose <u>Right</u>. The outcome reflecting the unique Nash equilibrium in this game is as follows: Brian chooses <u>Right</u> and Crystal chooses <u>Right</u>.
Explanation:
Given:
Crystal
Left Right
Brian Left 6, 3 6, 4
Right 3, 3 7, 4
A dominant strategy refers to a strategy that makes a player being better off regardless of the choice his opponent in a game.
It can be seen from the payoff matrix above that when Brian plays Left, Crystal chooses Right because 4 > 3. Also, when Brian plays Right, Crystal chooses Right because 4 > 3. The indication of this is that Crystal will always choose Right no matter what Brian chooses. This means that the dominant strategy for Crystal is Right.
On the other hand, when Crystal Chooses Left, Brian will also choose Left because 6 > 3. And when Crystal chooses Right, Brian will also play Right because 7 > 6. This is an indication that Brian does not have any specific strategy that makes him better off. Therefore, Brian does not have a dominant strategy.
Based on the analysis above, we have:
The only dominant strategy in this game is for <u>Crystal</u> to choose <u>Right</u>. The outcome reflecting the unique Nash equilibrium in this game is as follows: Brian chooses <u>Right</u> and Crystal chooses <u>Right</u>.
Answer:
i would ask for more proof and check on that employee
Explanation: