Answer:
(a) $ 1200
(b) $ 702.5
Explanation:
In the demand and supply curve, the price of goods and services changes with respect to market conditions such as scarcity and consumers' needs. In the problem, if the producers charge about $497.50, the scalper will definitely charge a price higher than that of the producers, in this case, $1200. Thus, this is $702.5 (i.e. $1200 - $497.50) more than the producers' charge.
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "B": ISO 14000.
Explanation:
ISO (International Organization for Standardization) 14000 refers to a series of norms in regards to environmental systems management that are related to<em> protection, prevention, pollution, </em>and <em>socio-economic needs</em>. ISO 14000 attempts ton find a balance between economic savings and the decrease of environmental damage.
Institutions ISO 14000 certified have proven to handle businesses keeping a strong environmental policy. In such a scenario, <em>the engineers investigating Minimotors should review the criteria evaluated at the moment of providing that company the ISO 14000 certification and if they have been following it.</em>
Answer:
performance data
Explanation:
It seems that the question is structured a little off, but based on the information that is provided the answer that would go in the blank area would be performance data. As mentioned in the question performance data provides all the information regarding a single transaction, including the date and type of contact that inquired about the product in question. Which is what is being described in the question as well as answers a) and b) which i believe is part of the initial question and not answer choices.
Answer:
10.68%
Explanation:
Data provided in the question:
Returns on stock : 12%, 16%, 10%, 19%, 15%, -6%
Now,
Geometric average return on the stock is calculated as:
Geometric average return = 
Thus,
For the given returns on stock
Geometric average return
=![[ (1 + 0.12)\times(1 + 0.16)\times(1 + 0.10)\times(1 + 0.19)\times(1 + 0.15)\times(1 + (- 0.06)) ]^{\frac{1}{6}}-1](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5B%20%281%20%2B%200.12%29%5Ctimes%281%20%2B%200.16%29%5Ctimes%281%20%2B%200.10%29%5Ctimes%281%20%2B%200.19%29%5Ctimes%281%20%2B%200.15%29%5Ctimes%281%20%2B%20%28-%200.06%29%29%20%5D%5E%7B%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B6%7D%7D-1)
= ![[ 1.12\times1.16\times1.10\times1.19\times1.15\times0.94 ]^{\frac{1}{6}}-1](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5B%201.12%5Ctimes1.16%5Ctimes1.10%5Ctimes1.19%5Ctimes1.15%5Ctimes0.94%20%5D%5E%7B%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B6%7D%7D-1)
= ![[1.8384056768]^{\frac{1}{6}}-1](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5B1.8384056768%5D%5E%7B%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B6%7D%7D-1)
= 1.1068 - 1
= 0.1068
or
= 0.1068 × 100%
= 10.68%
Answer: Fundamental attributional error.
Explanation:
Frank is making a fundamental attributional error when judging the cause of Anna's inability to meet sales target. Frank is blaming her failure based on her character rather than on the real reason which is the attractive sales offer of their competitors. Fundamental attributional error is an error which arises from judging a person's action based on their character without considering other possible external causes.
