Answer:
c. deviance is a product of economic conditions and is culturally passed from one generation to the next.
Explanation:
In sociology, the cultural transmission perspective was developed first by University of Chicago theorists who analyzed the records of county juvenile court records and after this analysis they reached the conclusion that the r<u>ates of delinquency decreased as they were farther away from the center of the city while the rates remained stable across the city neighborhoods</u>. Then, they concluded that this happened because <u>there were some characteristics inside the city and the city environment that sustained this criminal behavior (most likely attributed to economic conditions). </u>Therefore, if we generalize this idea, they concluded that <u>the city acts as a host for deviant behavior and these behaviors and countercultures are passed from one generation to the next thanks to this system. </u>
Therefore, The cultural transmission perspective was developed in part from the research of a group of sociologists at the University of Chicago who concluded that c. deviance is a product of economic conditions and is culturally passed from one generation to the next.
Answer:Human Nature. As Mencius is known for the slogan “human nature is good,” Xunzi is known for its opposite, “human nature is bad.” Mencius viewed self-cultivation as developing natural tendencies within us.
Explanation:
Answer: Market economies utilize private ownership as the means of production and voluntary exchanges/contracts but in a command economy, governments own the factors of production such as land, capital, and resources.
Explanation:
Answer:
please mark me as brainliest, thanks
Explanation:
so people get correct health care fast without hospitals the population would go down and a lot of people will fall sick
Answer:
Role Conflict
Explanation:
Role conflict is a term that refers to incomparable demands between a person's behavior and the position they occupy in a given situation. This conflict of roles causes an incompatibility in the expectations that a person has in relation to factors that make up his visibility or personality.
An example of this is the incompatibility of Charlotte's clothing as a candidate for a job, even if the clothing was appropriate for other situations.