In the First Amendment, freedom of speech is expressly guaranteed, ensuring the right of citizens to assemble for any government-related purpose. Equality of association covers the actions of those gatherings and the structure of them. Examples of freedom of expression here in the United States include criticism of the government and the advancement of theories or opinions that some would perceive to be divisive. In the U.S., under the limits of the "offense principle," or the "harm principle," these types of statements are permitted. I hope this helps.
Answer:
The Camps were a difficult place to live because the Japanese Americans who lived there had to endure bad food, inadequate medical care, and poorly equipped schools.
People who lived in the camps had to share bathroom and laundry facilities, and hot water was usually limited. The camps were surrounded by barbed wire and guards who were supposed to shoot those who tried to escape.
To summarize, the camps were not overly harsh or terrible, but it was unfair to force Japanese Americans to live in them when they had done nothing wrong, and when the living conditions at the camp were inadequate.
Please give me brainliest if I helped!
The Roman society was divided into three major social groups: patricians; plebeians; women and slaves;
Explanation:
The social structure in Rome, as in many ancient empires, was anything but fair or well structured. The society was roughly divided into three major groups. Those three groups were:
- patricians
- plebeians
- women and slaves
The patricians were the ones that controlled and ruled the society and they had all the rights in Rome. The plebeians were all the other people, or rather all other men in Rome, and they had some rights, but had to pay tax and serve in the military for them. These two groups had Roman citizenship.
The last group, women and slaves, was a group consisted of all of the women and all of the slaves in Rome. They had no rights whatsoever, and even if someone murdered them there were no consequences. They were also not given Roman citizenship.
According to Benjamin Constant, Liberty of the ancient required a long time and great effort to realize the involvement of the people in the political system.
<h3>Who is Benjamin Constant?</h3>
Benjamin Constant is a Swiss-French political activist and writer on politics and religion. He wrote a psychological-biographical novel called Adolphe. He is a loud liberal figure.
Benjamin Constant tries to replace <em>"Liberty of the Ancients"</em> with <em>"Liberty of the Moderns"</em>. The Liberty of the Ancients is a free, participatory republic, which gives citizens the right to directly influence politics through debate and voting in public meetings. In order to support the level of citizen participation, it takes a long time and considerable effort. He wants people to easily gather in one place to discuss public affairs.
The Liberty of the Moderns, on the other hand, is based on the possession of civil liberties, the rule of law, and freedom from excessive state interference.
According to Constant, a modern state can be seen from the unlimited direct participation. The modern state can also be seen from its commercial society and no slaves. But everyone has to earn a living through work. In the political field, citizens will elect representatives, who will negotiate in Parliament on behalf of the people and will save citizens from having to be involved in everyday politics.
Learn More About Benjamin Constant at : brainly.com/question/21832272
#SPJ4
Human Factors is the correct answer.
In Psychology, Human Factors (also known as human engineering or ergonomics) is the area of studies that focus on human behaviors and capabilities, how workers interact with the work tools and how we can create these tools to optmize worker's productivity, health and safety.
