Answer:
unconscious
Explanation:
Freud came to conclude that most of the behavior is driven by forces that are way out of our control and that they can be reduced to life (eros) or dead (Thanatos) drives- These forces are strong components that can shape our decisions and are seen in a metaphor:
The unconscious is the hidden part of the iceberg where we are just barely conscious of the surface while the hidden mental processes can be traced back to childhood experiences mostly. At least according to what Freud came to conclude, the unconscious mind is mainly a deposit of sex and destructive or aggressive drives that are impossible to express at the moment of being.
They are continually either repressed or rationalized as the main mechanisms the ego has for balancing inner needs with the outer world
Answer:
The correct answer is option B "National Labor Relations"
Explanation:
More than 33% of private area businesses (various guidelines apply in the open division) as of late reviewed confessed to having explicit standards forbidding workers from examining their compensation with coworkers.2' interestingly, just around 1 out of 14 bosses have effectively embraced a "pay transparency" policy. Around fifty-one percent of the businesses studied expressed that they didn't have a particular arrangement in regards to pay mystery or 21 confidentiality issues. Survey information additionally propose that chiefs are commonly inclined to24 PSC rules. A predictable finding in inquire about going back to the 1970s is that a huge extent of directors concur with the utilization of PSC (pay secrecy and confidentiality) rules. Available information along these lines seems to recommend that a noteworthy number of managers have either an inclination for, or have really established explicit PSC rules. To put it plainly, it's anything but an exaggeration to propose that businesses seem to lean toward pay mystery and secrecy.
What makes the predominance of these standards so intriguing is the way that they have been reliably seen as unlawful under the National Labor Relations Acts.
When the primary caregiver is inconsistent and has personal problems that impede her or his ability to be a good parent, a child is likely to end up with an <u>anxious-ambivalent </u>attachment style.
Early childhood is when anxious attachment, also known as ambivalent attachment in children, develops. Most frequently, poor and inconsistent parenting is to blame for nervous attachment. Common symptoms of this attachment type include low self-esteem, intense fear of rejection or abandonment, and clinginess in relationships.
A child with an ambivalent attachment style could "up-regulate" their behavior in an effort to maintain their closeness to their parent. When a child is removed from their caretaker, this could result in them acting upset, irate, and even throwing a temper tantrum.
To learn more about anxious-ambivalent attachment style, click
brainly.com/question/15012227
#SPJ4
Thats cool me too i neeeed more characters
Answer:
The correct answer is - <em>3000-2000 BC</em>.
Explanation:
The fundamental pattern of <u>Ancient Egyptian governance was set in Egypt between 3150 - 2890 BC</u> with the First Dynasty of Egypt. It resembled a theocratic monarchy where the king ruled and acted as a middle-man between his loyals and gods. The king was supported by vizier and other governmental officials. Kingdom was divided into districts (nomes) and was administered by nomarchs (regional governors) who oversaw all operations in nomes.
Although Egypt fits into this time-span, <em>Sumerians </em>are credited for the invention of government around 3500BC. Sumerians form of government was a mix of democracy and monarchy, where each city-state was ruled by king for the gods.
