Why is there sometimes conflict and tension between the police, prosecutors, and corrections? Why is there often tension and con
flict between state, federal, and local authorities? What are some of the costs of this tension and conflict? Without making major changes in the system, what do you think could be done to lessen this tension and conflict?
Prosecutors and police departments work closely with corrections. There are several reasons why there is tension between police, prosecutors and corrections. For example when a prosecutor has to bring charges against the police for abuse of power, as we've seen in New York and Ferguson. Here's the issue, prosecutors are usually the ones who decide whether officers are indicted. If they bring the charges, or they influence a grand jury to do so they can make their relationship with the police rather uncomfortable. Prosecutors work with the police every day. This can create some conflict.
<em> With such issues, a final decision is possible only in the form of a compromise. Even when we talk about federal, state and local autorities, in such cases a keynote speaker may be able to influence the three different parties to reach an agreement without making major structural changes. In marketing we would refer to this speaker as a KOL or Key Opinion Leader, a thought leader is able to lessen the cost of tensions when disagreeing on a topic. If this doesn’t work, then making major changes to the system is required to reach a compromise. </em>
The origins of El Dorado lie deep in South America. And like all enduring legends, the tale of El Dorado contains some scraps of truth. When Spanish explorers reached South America in the early 16th century, they heard stories about a tribe of natives high in the Andes mountains in what is now Colombia.
The Corps of Discovery was a select group of U.S. Volunteers under the command of Captain Meriwether Lewis and his close friend Second Lieutenant William Clark. The expedition made its way westward.
