<span>IF ONE OF THE PARTIES OF A COURT CASE DOES NOT AGREE WITH THE THE VERDICT THEY HAVE THE OPTION OF TRYING TO APPEAL IT AT A HIGHER COURT. IF THE COURT DECIDES DECIDES TO ALLOW THE APPEAL THEY HAVE THE OPTION OF ANOTHER COURT TRIAL.</span>
Answer:
enforceable even without Robin's signature because both parties are merchants.
Explanation:
Enforceable law defines when one person performs legally contract and that party enforce or impose to the other.
Therefore in the given situation, Robin sends the written confirmation of the sale, which was sufficient under the statute of frauds, Bellman signs and Robin fails to send the goods. So, this contract is enforceable because without Robin's signature because both parties are merchants.
Answer:
See Below
Explanation:
We can use the future price formula here, which is:
Where
F is the theoretical future price
P is the present index standing
r_f is the risk free rate
d_y is the dividend yield
n is the number of months of the futures deliverable
Now,
given
P = 395
r_f = 0.1
d_y = 0.03
n = 3
Substituting, we get:
Actual future price is 404. The index future price is higher. So the strategy would be to sell the futures contracts. Long the shares underlying the index.
Answer:
be honest with stuffs
pay enough attention to every thing and everyone
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "B": annual percentage rate.
Explanation:
The Annual Percentage Rate or APR is the cost per year of borrowing. By law, all financial institutions must show customers the APR of a loan or credit card, which clearly indicates the real cost of the loan. It is not the same as the Interest Rate on a loan. Loans charge interest rates but usually charge other fees such as closing costs, origination fees, and insurance costs.
