1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
ankoles [38]
3 years ago
12

It is now 10 years after you have graduated. You are advising a large company regarding its compensation and tax planning for it

s highly-compensated employees. Suppose that the top personal tax rate and the corporate tax rate are both 35%. Suppose Congress increases the top personal tax rate to 40% decreases the corporate tax rate to 31%, but the changes will not take effect for another three years.
(Assume r = 6.5% throughout this problem.)

a. What is the amount of deferred compensation that the employer could offer and be indifferent between deferred compensation and $1 of salary?
b. The employer is aware that, if he offers the deferred compensation computed in (a), then the employee will choose salary. In fact, the employer recognizes that the employee would choose salary over deferred compensation even if his salary was reduced a bit. Using the deferred compensation figure computed in (a), how much of a pay cut would the employee accept and still prefer salary over deferred compensation?
c. Same facts as #1. However, the company is short on cash and must pay deferred compensation. How much deferred compensation will the employee demand three years from today to be indifferent between salary today and deferred compensation three years from today?
Business
1 answer:
My name is Ann [436]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

Answer is explained below.

Explanation:

(a)

For the employer to be indifferent the FV of the salary should be equal to the PV of deferred compensation

after three years

The net salary cost to the company = Salary * (1- tax rate)

Tax benefit on Salary at current tax rate 35%  

Net cost to company for $ 1 Salary

Salary $1.00  

Less: Tax benefit  35% $0.35

Net salary cost to Company $0.65

Tax benefit on Deferred compensation after 3 years 31%  

The deferred compensation should be an amount whose PV at rate of return of 6.50% should be $ 0.65

so that the employer remains indifferent between salary and deferred compensation.

Hence, we will calculate the future value of the after tax salary cost to company for $ 1 salary paid.

After tax cost to the Company $0.65  

FV = PV * (1+r) ^ n

where, PV is the present value of the after tax salary cost

r = rate of return( which is 6.50% as stated in the problem)

n = period (which is 3 years as stated in the problem)

= 0.65 * (1+.065) ^ 3

=0.65 * (1.065) ^ 3

= 0.65 * 1.21

= $ 0.79

The value derived above is the after tax cost of deferred compensation to the Company.We will calculate the

gross deferred tax cost to the company after considering the tax rate after 3 years

After tax value of deferred compensation $0.79  

Tax rate for the company (after 3 years) 31%

Deferred tax compensation (After tax value/(1 - tax rate)) $1.14

The company would be offering $ 1.14 as deferred compensation after 3 years for every $ 1 of salary it offers

at the present and would be indifferent between the two offers.

(b)

The company would be offering $ 1.14 as deferred compensation after 3 years for every $ 1 of salary it offers

at the present.

The net deferred compensation receivable by the employees after deducting tax at the rates applicable after

3 years would be as under

Deferred tax compensation offerred by the Company $1.14  

Tax rate after 3 years for employees 40%

Net deferred compensation receivable by the employees $0.68

The employees would prefer salary in the current year if the future value of the salary after 3 years is not

less than deferred compensation they will receive after three years

Net deferred compensation receivable by the employees        0.68    

The employee would agree to salary in the current at lower amounts if the future value after 3 years is

not less than $ 0.68

Hence, to calculate the minimum acceptable salary, we would calculate the present value if the

future value after 3 years at rate of return of 6.50% is $ 0.68

Calculation of the PV if the future value is $ 0.68

PV = FV/(1+r) ^ n

= 0.68/(1+0.065) ^ 3

= 0.68/1.21

= $ 0.56

The value derived above is the after tax value of salary to the employee.We will calculate the

gross salary receivable by the employee after considering the tax rate after 3 years

After tax value $0.56  

Tax rate on salary for current year for employees 35%

Gross salary(After tax salary/(1-tax rate)) $0.86

Hence, the employee would be ready to take a salary cut of $ 0.14 per $ 1 of salary

The pay cut which would agreeable to the employee would be 14% of their current salary

(c.)

PV of deferred compensation should be $ 0.65 for the employee to be indifferent

FV = PV * (1+r) ^ n

= $ 0.65 * (1+.065) ^ 3

= $ 0.65 * (1.065) ^ 3

= $ 0.65 * 1.21

= $ 0.79

The value derived above is the after tax value of salary to the employee.We will calculate the

gross salary receivable by the employee after considering the tax rate for the current year

After tax value of deferred compensation $0.79  

Tax rate for current year for the employees 40%

Deferred tax compensation(After tax salary/(1-tax rate)) $1.32

You might be interested in
The marketing information system​ (mis) consists of​ _______, __________, and​ ___________to generate and validate actionable cu
jeka57 [31]
People and procedures for assessing information​ needs, developing the needed​ information, and helping decision makers use the information. Hope it is helpful. Peace✌️
3 0
3 years ago
If the price level increases in the United States relative to foreign countries, then American consumers will purchase more fore
baherus [9]

Answer:

The correct answer is (C) the foreign purchases effect.

Explanation:

As a result of a negative situation for the internal economy, where the price of goods and services increases as a result of economic phenomena, people and companies tend to resort to the process of purchasing abroad, in order to meet their needs with A minimum amount of money.

5 0
3 years ago
In market economies, firms rarely worry about the availability of inputs to produce their products, whereas in command economies
Elina [12.6K]

Answer: In market economies, buyers of inputs know that sellers want to earn profits.

Explanation: In a command economy, the state decides about what goods are to be produced, how much they must be produced and at what price they must be distributed in the society. While, in a market economy decisions about investment and production are determined by the forces of demand and supply. A command economy focuses on social welfare and equal distribution. While a market economy is driven by the profit motive. Thus, it is easy for firms to buy inputs in a market economy than in a command economy. In market economies, buyers of inputs know that sellers want to earn profits.

7 0
3 years ago
The less our perceived amount of __________ in relation to a stressor, the more stressful we perceive the event to be.
Naddika [18.5K]

The less our perceived amount of control in relation to a stressor, the more stressful we perceive the event to be.

Hans Selye first proposed the concept of stress as a physiological response pattern in 1956. This concept was incorporated into his general adaptation syndrome (GAS) model.

This model incorporates three ideas and lists stress as a dependent variable:

  • Stress is a form of defense.
  • The three stages of alert, resistance, and exhaustion are followed by stress.
  • Stress that is protracted or severe enough to cause disorders of adaption or even mortality may occur.

An essential stress-reduction strategy is the perception of control. Even if they are in control but are unaware of it, people become worried when they feel that they are not in charge. People experience stress when they feel out of control due to a lack of resources, coping mechanisms, etc. that would allow them to manage the issue effectively.

To learn more about stress click here:

brainly.com/question/14413080

#SPJ4

3 0
2 years ago
Carrington Company agrees to make lease payments of $309.32 at the end of each month for 60 months for the use of equipment. The
lozanna [386]

Answer: $2559,49

Explanation:

Please see the attached exercise, the result is the sum of the monthly interest paid.

3 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Suppose a family has saved enough for a 10 day vacation (the only one they will be able to take for 10 years) and has a utility
    8·1 answer
  • Assume a $80,000 investment and the following cash flows for two alternatives. Year Investment X Investment Y 1 $20,000 $40,000
    7·1 answer
  • Joey and his girlfriend plan to get married in a year, when they are both 19 and working. They both come from large, loving fami
    8·1 answer
  • Joaquin is offered vocational training that will cost $3,000 but will make him eligible for a promotion. Joaquin is trying to de
    15·2 answers
  • Make an entry as of december 31, 2017, recording any necessary amortization. (round answers to 0 decimal places,
    13·1 answer
  • Under the authority of the commerce clause, Congress can pass laws as long as what criteria are met?
    5·1 answer
  • Galena is a new agent for a financial services company. She decides to join the local chamber of commerce, the local association
    12·1 answer
  • The bottom-up approach for estimating times and costs that uses costs from past projects that were similar to the current projec
    12·1 answer
  • Complex projects such as research and development for new products often employ rolling wave planning to estimate costs. Which o
    10·2 answers
  • During January, the production department of a process operations system completed and transferred to finished goods a total of
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!