Group of answer choices.
A. the election of lawmakers to legislate on the people's behalf
B. provisions for first-past-the-post voting
C. juries of one's peers
D. all laws being decided by public referendum
Answer:
all laws being decided by public referendum.
Explanation:
Democracy can be defined as a government of the people, by the people and for the people.
There are two (2) main types of democracy and these include;
I. Representative democracy: it's also known as indirect democracy and can be defined as a form of government which typically involves the process of having the citizens of a particular country vote to elect representatives (political leaders) to enact laws, create policies and make decisions on their behalf.
II. Direct democracy: it can be defined as a process which typically involves the candidates voting for their preferred choice. Thus, their choices are reflected directly on the subject matter.
Hence, both representative democracy and direct democracy are forms of rule by the people. A representative democracy also involves all laws promulgated across the country being decided by public referendum i.e the entire electorate are invited and availed with the opportunity to vote on the particular law.
There are reasons why people often behave in certain ways. Dana was experiencing emotional hijacking.
<h3>What is An emotional hijacking? </h3>
- An emotional hijacking often takes place when something in one's environment influences a stress outburst in man. It might be a friend or close partner shouting, a work colleague lambasting you etc.
When a person experience stress, the brain releases two kinds of stress hormones called cortisol and adrenaline that makes the body to fight or to flee.
Conclusively, Hijacking is the correct option.
Learn more about emotional hijacking from
brainly.com/question/7905042
The national association for the advancement of colored people (NAACP) was the union that was opened to African-Americans.
Yes, Like most strategic bombing during World War II, the aim of the air offensive against Japan was to destroy the enemy's war industries, kill or disable civilian employees of these industries, and undermine civilian morale. If a means is justified by an end, the use of the atomic bomb was justified for it brought Japan to her knees and ended the horrible war. If the war had gone longer, without the use of the atomic bomb, how many thousands and thousands of helpless men, women and children would have needlessly died and suffered ...?
Hope this helps ❤❤
